2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2021.102174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active learning for structural reliability: Survey, general framework and benchmark

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Structural reliability analysis is often carried out to quantitatively assess the probability of structures' safe or failure state under the impact of uncertain factors in the environmental, structural and load parameters. Various structural reliability analysis methods, which can be broadly categorized into three main types: simulation-based methods, analytical methods or approximation methods, and meta-modeling methods, have been proposed over the past three decades [1,2].…”
Section: Akmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural reliability analysis is often carried out to quantitatively assess the probability of structures' safe or failure state under the impact of uncertain factors in the environmental, structural and load parameters. Various structural reliability analysis methods, which can be broadly categorized into three main types: simulation-based methods, analytical methods or approximation methods, and meta-modeling methods, have been proposed over the past three decades [1,2].…”
Section: Akmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. In both the APCK-IS and the APCK-SuS, the Polynomial Chaos-Kriging (PCK) model [25] and the U learning function are adopted; the stopping condition is defined in terms of the bound of the estimated failure probability in 2 successive iterations, with the tolerance being -2 1 10  [13]; the sample size of each subset in the SuS is taken as 5 10 . For more details, the reader is referred to [13].…”
Section: Endmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both the APCK-IS and the APCK-SuS, the Polynomial Chaos-Kriging (PCK) model [25] and the U learning function are adopted; the stopping condition is defined in terms of the bound of the estimated failure probability in 2 successive iterations, with the tolerance being -2 1 10  [13]; the sample size of each subset in the SuS is taken as 5 10 . For more details, the reader is referred to [13]. In the standard PDEM, the sample size of representative points is taken as 2000, exactly equal to the initial representative point size of the AK-PDEMi; the AK-PDEM corresponds exactly to the first run of the AK process in the AK-PDEMi, which is denoted as the 0-th loop hereafter.…”
Section: Endmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations