2020
DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv.12660083.v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active Learning for Robust, High-Complexity Reactive Atomistic Simulations

Abstract: Machine learned reactive force fields based on polynomial expansions have been shown to be highly effective for describing simulations involving reactive materials. Nevertheless, the highly flexible nature of these models can give rise to a large number of candidate parameters for complicated systems. In these cases, reliable parameterization requires a well-formed training set, which can be difficult to achieve through standard iterative fitting methods. Here we present an active learning approach based on cl… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This avoids reliance on iterative approaches that are required for nonlinear optimization problems (e.g., Levenberg–Marquardt) that are usually more computationally time-consuming and not guaranteed to result in the global minimum. ChIMES models have been extended to include four-body interactions in a similar fashion in reactive MD simulations, 16 , 19 though truncation of the ChIMES total energy with the three-body term has proven sufficient for determination of the DFTB repulsive energy. Note that DFTB in its original formulation uses a consistent two-center approximation in both the Hamiltonian matrix elements and the repulsive energy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This avoids reliance on iterative approaches that are required for nonlinear optimization problems (e.g., Levenberg–Marquardt) that are usually more computationally time-consuming and not guaranteed to result in the global minimum. ChIMES models have been extended to include four-body interactions in a similar fashion in reactive MD simulations, 16 , 19 though truncation of the ChIMES total energy with the three-body term has proven sufficient for determination of the DFTB repulsive energy. Note that DFTB in its original formulation uses a consistent two-center approximation in both the Hamiltonian matrix elements and the repulsive energy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of the variable-charge ChIMES model is the subject of future work. ChIMES efforts are also currently underway to establish an active learning framework for automated selection/addition of isolated species 29 . The final training trajectory consisted of 60 original DFT frames (20 frames for each thermodynamic state), 60 frames from random displacement configurations, 420 gas molecules, and 22 frames taken from the iterative fitting scheme.…”
Section: A Model Details and Training Set Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In its original formulation, ChIMES employs only two-and three-body interactions in the functional form 28 . Recently, it has been extended to also include four-body interactions 29 . The ChIMES model is parameterized by matching to reference data for selected configurations which are taken from short DFT-MD trajectories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 In the past decade, researchers have developed a broad spectrum of different ML potentials. [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] Recently, an ML-based model called Deep Potential -Smooth Edition (DeepPot-SE) 36 was developed to efficiently represent organic molecules, metals, semiconductors and insulators with an accuracy comparable to that of ab initio QM models. The DeepPot-SE model has recently been highlighted in simulations of interfacial processes in aqueous aerosol 37 and large-scale combustion reactions in the gas phase, 38 and demonstrated great success in providing predictive insight into complex reaction processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%