2022
DOI: 10.1017/pds.2022.165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active-Learning Combined with Topology Optimization for Top-Down Design of Multi-Component Systems

Abstract: In top-down design, optimal component requirements are difficult to derive, as the feasible components that satisfy these requirements are yet to be designed and hence unknown. Meta models that provide feasibility and mass estimates for component performance are used for optimal requirement decomposition in an existing approach. This paper (1) extends its applicability adapting it to varying design domains, and (2) increases its efficiency by active-learning. Applying it to the design of a robot arm produces a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the shortcoming of the design process shown in Figure 2 is that the mass and inertial properties of the components are not known in step D 1 and are only computed later in D 2 . Therefore, future work would extend the procedure to a fully automatic optimisation process that includes an informed decomposition by training meta-models for design domains, as introduced in [52]. Another potential direction is to perform mass minimisation with the minimum eigenfrequency requirement as a constraint, accounting for the dynamic stiffness of each of the OSEs, as explored in [67].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the shortcoming of the design process shown in Figure 2 is that the mass and inertial properties of the components are not known in step D 1 and are only computed later in D 2 . Therefore, future work would extend the procedure to a fully automatic optimisation process that includes an informed decomposition by training meta-models for design domains, as introduced in [52]. Another potential direction is to perform mass minimisation with the minimum eigenfrequency requirement as a constraint, accounting for the dynamic stiffness of each of the OSEs, as explored in [67].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An approach based on the so-called solution space was presented in [50] as a strategy to decouple a multi-component system, enabling the independent design of the respective components. A meta-model-informed decomposition was introduced in [51,52], eliminating the need for coordination between sub-problems. The current work adopts such a distributed optimisation approach by decomposing the system-level requirements into componentlevel specifications, presenting a computationally tractable way to compute mass optimal topologies of robotic links.…”
Section: Structural Optimisation Of Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with 𝑠 (𝑖) being the length of the 𝑖th link. The procedure of decomposing compliance requirements from the system level on to component level is called uninformed decomposition as it only requires the geometrical information of the system in order to derive requirements compared to the informed decomposition with trained meta models presented by Krischer et al 2022 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑗 = 1 … 𝑛 dofs .…”
Section: Problem Setup and System Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%