2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00210-004-0960-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active immunization against nicotine alters the distribution of nicotine but not the metabolism to cotinine in the rat

Abstract: We have previously shown that active immunization with the nicotine immunoconjugate IP18-KLH attenuates the reinforcing effects of nicotine, i.e., suppresses the nicotine-induced brain dopamine release and prevents reinstatement of the nicotine-seeking behavior in rats. These effects are thought to be due to an alteration of the kinetics of nicotine distribution by the antibodies, resulting in an attenuated nicotine distribution to the brain. In this study, the distribution of nicotine administered at doses co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
13
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
5
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there was no evidence of an increase in the elimination t 1/2 of cocaine in plasma. This is consistent with the reported lack of effect of active immunization on either the elimination of cocaine from plasma (Fox et al, 1996;Fox, 1997) or the rate of metabolism of nicotine (de Villiers et al, 2004). However, a murine antinicotine mAb (Keyler et al, 2005) and active immunization against nicotine (Keyler et al, 1999) have also been reported to significantly increase the elimination t 1/2 of nicotine in rats.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, there was no evidence of an increase in the elimination t 1/2 of cocaine in plasma. This is consistent with the reported lack of effect of active immunization on either the elimination of cocaine from plasma (Fox et al, 1996;Fox, 1997) or the rate of metabolism of nicotine (de Villiers et al, 2004). However, a murine antinicotine mAb (Keyler et al, 2005) and active immunization against nicotine (Keyler et al, 1999) have also been reported to significantly increase the elimination t 1/2 of nicotine in rats.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This pharmacokinetic model requires that 2E2 binding of cocaine does not slow the rate of elimination of cocaine in rats, which is consistent with what was observed in mice (Norman et al, 2007). Because anti-nicotine antibodies have been reported to decrease nicotine clearance in some studies (Keyler et al, 1999(Keyler et al, , 2005 but not in others (de Villiers et al, 2004), verification of our prediction will require additional studies that will be conducted as additional supplies of 2E2 are available.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Because the nicotine-specific antibodies elicited by either vaccination or passive immunization seem to affect nicotine pharmacokinetics in a similar manner, these data support the hypothesis that the primary effect of both vaccination and passive immunization is to slow rather than to prevent the distribution of nicotine to brain. The duration of antibody effect on nicotine distribution is not entirely clear, but effects persisting for up to 25 to 60 min have been reported previously (Satoskar et al, 2003;de Villiers et al, 2004). Limited data are available from analogous studies of vaccination or passive immunization for other drugs of abuse.…”
Section: Antibody Effects On Nicotine Distribution In Rats 663mentioning
confidence: 94%