2014
DOI: 10.1002/2014jb011294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active faulting in apparently stable peninsular India: Rift inversion and a Holocene‐age great earthquake on the Tapti Fault

Abstract: We present observations of active faulting within peninsular India, far from the surrounding plate boundaries. Offset alluvial fan surfaces indicate one or more magnitude 7.6–8.4 thrust‐faulting earthquakes on the Tapti Fault (Maharashtra, western India) during the Holocene. The high ratio of fault displacement to length on the alluvial fan offsets implies high stress‐drop faulting, as has been observed elsewhere in the peninsula. The along‐strike extent of the fan offsets is similar to the thickness of the se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(124 reference statements)
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These characteristics allow the occurrence of unusually large intraplate events (M w 8+). Similar rupture characteristics have been observed in northwestern India in the 2001 Bhuj earthquake and inferred from prehistoric surface ruptures on the Tapti Fault (Copley et al 2011(Copley et al , 2014. The fact that the entire crust appears to be seismogenic in these regions is commonly attributed to unusual lower-crustal compositions, perhaps due to the absence of small amounts of hydrogen ions dissolved in the crystal lattice of nominally anhydrous minerals, which can greatly increase the strength of rocks (e.g.…”
Section: Shillong Plateausupporting
confidence: 64%
“…These characteristics allow the occurrence of unusually large intraplate events (M w 8+). Similar rupture characteristics have been observed in northwestern India in the 2001 Bhuj earthquake and inferred from prehistoric surface ruptures on the Tapti Fault (Copley et al 2011(Copley et al , 2014. The fact that the entire crust appears to be seismogenic in these regions is commonly attributed to unusual lower-crustal compositions, perhaps due to the absence of small amounts of hydrogen ions dissolved in the crystal lattice of nominally anhydrous minerals, which can greatly increase the strength of rocks (e.g.…”
Section: Shillong Plateausupporting
confidence: 64%
“…This effect has been proposed to explain a rupture depth of 25 km in the 2016 M w 7.8 Kaikoura earthquake inferred from geodetic data (Hamling et al, ). For the same thermal reason, we expect intraplate earthquakes to have a thicker seismogenic layer (Copley et al, ) and hence a larger H c than interplate earthquakes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In addition to a thicker seismogenic layer (Copley et al, ), intraplate earthquakes have average stress drop significantly larger than interplate earthquakes (Allmann & Shearer, ; Scholz et al, ). Moreover, Kato () suggests that, in contrast to interplate faults, the loading of intraplate faults is dominated by regional plate stressing rather than by aseismic slip in deeper extensions of the fault; hence, the loading of the seismogenic zone tends to be more spatially uniform than on interplate faults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Dawki Fault is the major active fault in the region, with an offset of 13-15 km (this study) and a horizontal convergence rate of 3-7 mm/yr (Vernant et al, 2014). From scaling laws (Kanamori & Anderson, 1975) and examples 10.1002/2017JB014714 of previous intraplate earthquakes within the Indian Peninsula (Copley et al, 2014), such a fault is capable of producing ∼20 m slip, resulting in an M w ∼8 magnitude earthquake. The fault scarp is observed at least for a length of ∼200 km along the southern margin of the Shillong Plateau and given the seismogenic thickness of the Bengal Basin crust of ∼20 km and an offset of ∼15 km, the active fault dimension is estimated to be ∼200 km by ∼35 km.…”
Section: Geodynamic Evolution Of the Eastern Himalayan Plate Boundarymentioning
confidence: 78%