2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2017.03.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active fault topography along Kangra Valley Fault in the epicentral zone of 1905 Mw7.8 earthquake NW Himalaya, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A compilation of some ongoing research was published during the reporting period as a special volume of the journal Quaternary International (Jayangondaperumal et al, 2017b).The volume presents 16 topical papers, which include morphotectonic analyses from the Nahansalient using several geomorphic indices such as stream length gradient index (steepness index), Hack profile convexities, and hypsometric integral (HI) alongwith hypsometric curve and elevation profiles (Kaushal et al, 2017). These studies reported spatially variable tectonic process across the Nahansalient and also reported identification of new active structure(s) that could be important for an improved seismotectonic evaluation of the salient Further west in the Kangra recess, Sahoo and Malik (2017) worked out further details of the active fault topography of the right lateral strike-slip fault i.e. the Kangra Valley Fault (KVF) along its length of about 60 km.…”
Section: Nw Himalayamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A compilation of some ongoing research was published during the reporting period as a special volume of the journal Quaternary International (Jayangondaperumal et al, 2017b).The volume presents 16 topical papers, which include morphotectonic analyses from the Nahansalient using several geomorphic indices such as stream length gradient index (steepness index), Hack profile convexities, and hypsometric integral (HI) alongwith hypsometric curve and elevation profiles (Kaushal et al, 2017). These studies reported spatially variable tectonic process across the Nahansalient and also reported identification of new active structure(s) that could be important for an improved seismotectonic evaluation of the salient Further west in the Kangra recess, Sahoo and Malik (2017) worked out further details of the active fault topography of the right lateral strike-slip fault i.e. the Kangra Valley Fault (KVF) along its length of about 60 km.…”
Section: Nw Himalayamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Himalayan arc with ~2500 km length is continuously growing and causing many damaging earthquakes in the foothills (Rajendran et al2017). Many authors investigated major earthquakes through palaeoseismological studies for assessing the seismic hazard, location and intensity in all along the Himalayan arc such as 1905 Kangra (Mw ≤ 8.0, Ambreseys and Bilham 2000; Sahoo and Malik 2017), 1934Bihar-Nepal (Mw 8.2, Rajendran et al 2017), 1897Shillong (M 8.1, Sukhija et al 1999a), and 1950Upper Assam (Mw 8.6,Reddy et al 2009Priyanka et al 2017;Coudurier-Curveur • 2020;Rajendran and Rajendran 2021). In which Eastern Himalayan Syntaxis (EHS), where three tectonic domains interact and has produced largest intra-continental earthquake ever known (eg.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These regional faults cut across the major thrust systems. They include Karakoram Fault, Kishtwar Fault, Mansa Devi Fault, Kala Amb Tear Fault, Ganga and Yamuna Tear Faults,, Judi Fault and Bari Gad Fault (Paudel & Arita, 2000;Nakata & Kumahara, 2002;Malik & Nakata, 2003;Silver et al, 2015;Verma & Bansal, 2016;Sahoo & Malik, 2017;Kanna et al, 2018). Space-time distribution of earthquakes along the Himalayan plate boundary has been investigated with an aim to discerning uctuations in seismicity rates associated with great earthquakes, the possibilities of epicenter migration and identi cation of the gaps in seismic activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%