2013
DOI: 10.1002/acs.2441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active fault tolerant control of piecewise affine systems with reference tracking and input constraints

Abstract: An active fault tolerant control (AFTC) method is proposed for discrete-time piecewise affine (PWA) systems. Only actuator faults are considered. The AFTC framework contains a supervisory scheme, which selects a suitable controller in a set of controllers such that the stability and an acceptable performance of the faulty system are held. The design of the supervisory scheme is not considered here. The set of controllers is composed of a normal controller for the fault-free case, an active fault detection and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to their capability in modeling non-smooth dynamics, they can also be used as a model for nonlinear (smooth) systems by using hybridization methods such as those in [2][3][4][5]. Various analysis and control problems, such as model reduction [6,7], controllability and observability [8], identification [9][10][11], fault detection and estimation, tracking, stabilization, and control [12][13][14][15][16], [17,Chapters 4 and 5], have been studied for the class of PWA systems. The vast literature on PWA systems is primarily motivated by their significant modeling capabilities, but also by the fact that their description via affine equations and constraints can simplify analysis and design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to their capability in modeling non-smooth dynamics, they can also be used as a model for nonlinear (smooth) systems by using hybridization methods such as those in [2][3][4][5]. Various analysis and control problems, such as model reduction [6,7], controllability and observability [8], identification [9][10][11], fault detection and estimation, tracking, stabilization, and control [12][13][14][15][16], [17,Chapters 4 and 5], have been studied for the class of PWA systems. The vast literature on PWA systems is primarily motivated by their significant modeling capabilities, but also by the fact that their description via affine equations and constraints can simplify analysis and design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is able to deal with unforeseen faults and has the potential to achieve optimal performance for 2 Journal of Control Science and Engineering different system operating scenarios. Compared to PFTC, the AFTC method has a better overall performance and is more flexible in design, so it is used more widely [12][13][14][15][16]. In AFTC, the model-based method, the knowledge-based method, the data-based method, and other methods can be adopted [17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, several aircraft have experienced major control system failures during recent years. Fault‐tolerant control (FTC) is viewed as one of the most effective methods to improve the safety and reliability of the flight control systems, which have become attractive topics and have recently drawn considerable attention . Depending on how redundancies are utilized, current FTC can be classified into two categories, namely, passive FTC and active FTC .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%