2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-7078.2012.00126.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active Experience Shapes 10‐Month‐Old Infants’ Understanding of Collaborative Goals

Abstract: Collaborative activities in which individuals coordinate their actions to attain a common goal play a fundamental role in our everyday lives. Evidence suggests that infants engage in collaborative activities before their first birthday, however little is known about infants’ understanding of collaborative action. Using a visual habituation paradigm, this research consists of two experiments designed to investigate whether 10-month-olds understand that the actions of collaborative partners are critical to the a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
39
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
4
39
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the study contribute to the literature surrounding the development of an understanding of cooperation early in life. The finding that infants can structure the box-toy event used in the present research as F I G U R E 2 Infants' average looking times (±SE) towards the test trials for each condition cooperative has been replicated in more than one lab and tested alongside several control conditions (see Henderson et al, 2013;Henderson & Woodward, 2011). We extend this work by demonstrating that infants do not structure the box-toy event the same way when a robot is introduced as a partner.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of the study contribute to the literature surrounding the development of an understanding of cooperation early in life. The finding that infants can structure the box-toy event used in the present research as F I G U R E 2 Infants' average looking times (±SE) towards the test trials for each condition cooperative has been replicated in more than one lab and tested alongside several control conditions (see Henderson et al, 2013;Henderson & Woodward, 2011). We extend this work by demonstrating that infants do not structure the box-toy event the same way when a robot is introduced as a partner.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Research demonstrates that an engagement in and understanding of these requirements of cooperation emerges early in life (e.g., Brownell, ; Brownell & Carriger, ; Eckerman & Didow, ; Hay, ; Henderson & Woodward, ; Henderson, Wang, Matz, & Woodward, ; Ross & Lollis, ; Warneken, Chen, & Tomasello, ; Warneken & Tomasello, see Melis & Warneken, for review). In fact, by the age of 14 months, infants can structure the actions of two human agents as being towards a shared goal (Henderson et al, ; Henderson & Woodward, ). To illustrate, Henderson and Woodward () habituated 14‐month‐old infants to an event in which one actor (i.e., box opener) opened a box and another (i.e., toy getter) reached inside to retrieve a toy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although our findings cannot directly answer this question, we speculate that active participation is more important. First, prior work suggests that active experience plays an important role and may have a distinct effect over observational experience in infants’ understanding of others’ actions (Henderson, Wang, Matz, & Woodward, 2013; Gerson & Woodward, 2014; Gerson, Bekkering, & Hunnius, 2015; Sommerville, Hildebrand, & Crane, 2008). By extension, we think active experience was more important in facilitating sharing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One interpretation to explain this finding is that infants could not benefit from a representation of the overarching joint goal in the same way as adults. Such an interpretation is supported by studies showing that infants in their first year of life are usually not yet able to infer [29] or anticipate joint action [2]. Without such a representation, gaze could not be guided towards sub-goals in a top-down manner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%