2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2016.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active distribution network fault location methodology: A minimum fault reactance and Fibonacci search approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
39
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, Switches 11,12,13,15,22,25,31,35,55,57 and 78 are opened to keep the radiality of the system. The two faults, illustrated in Figure 15, occur in the same lateral in feeder F1.…”
Section: Test Case 3: Simultaneous Faults In the Same Lateralmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this case, Switches 11,12,13,15,22,25,31,35,55,57 and 78 are opened to keep the radiality of the system. The two faults, illustrated in Figure 15, occur in the same lateral in feeder F1.…”
Section: Test Case 3: Simultaneous Faults In the Same Lateralmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some methods have used simple but time-consuming visual inspection to locate the fault [2]. Other fault location algorithms that have been proposed include impedance based methods [3][4][5][6][7][8], travelling-wave based methods [9][10][11], minimum fault reactance methods [12,13], voltage-sag based methods [14][15][16][17], knowledge based methods [18][19][20], and multi-agent approaches [21,22]. However, due to the relatively complex nature of distribution systems, each of these methods has some disadvantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, researchers have found that embedded generation on distribution systems can increase the fault level in the system. Hence, Orozco-Henao et al [5] have presented a fault location (FL) analytical methodology for active distribution networks. The suggested technique has been used to assess the ideal fault level and location.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%