2022
DOI: 10.1080/00102202.2022.2114796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active Control of Fuel Position in Opposed-Flow Strand Burner Experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noting that mechanisms such as radiation and heterogeneous reactions, although not directly contingent on mass flux, still have the potential to influence fuel regression, as demonstrated in prior research [41,42]. Nevertheless, it is important to observe that the trend in regression rate exponents observed in this study for the typical opposed flow burner configuration aligns closely with findings from existing literature [37,[39][40]. These mechanisms are believed to be the primary contributors to the observed distinctions between the data from the motor and the opposed burner.…”
Section: Regression Rate Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is worth noting that mechanisms such as radiation and heterogeneous reactions, although not directly contingent on mass flux, still have the potential to influence fuel regression, as demonstrated in prior research [41,42]. Nevertheless, it is important to observe that the trend in regression rate exponents observed in this study for the typical opposed flow burner configuration aligns closely with findings from existing literature [37,[39][40]. These mechanisms are believed to be the primary contributors to the observed distinctions between the data from the motor and the opposed burner.…”
Section: Regression Rate Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In this study, the reported regression rate exponents for the opposed burner in this study are found to be lower than the theoretically expected value of 0.8 for convective heat transfer-controlled regression in HTPB hybrid rocket motor configurations, as reported in the literature [37,38]. These disparities in data are likely attributed to the scaling effects resulting from the utilization of 1-D fuel pellet samples in opposed burner [37,[39][40]. The scaling effects alter the fluid dynamics of the oxidizer on the fuel surface and the heat conduction to the opposed-flow burner.…”
Section: Regression Rate Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 65%