2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2018.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active control of composite fuselage type structures with enclosed acoustic cavity

Abstract: An active structural acoustic control system for a composite fuselage type structure is developed in this paper. The focus of the active control system is the global reduction of the sound field in an enclosed acoustic cavity using structureintegrated sensors and actuators. Active structural acoustic control systems are commonly designed based on the acoustic radiation modes which diagonalize a radiation operator. In the case of interior sound radiation, this radiation operator is derived in this paper from th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although, the error is strongly affected by the frequency shifting of the pressure response and if the areas of the curves are compared, the total error is reduced to 0.052%, which is more accurate than the simple pressure value comparison for this kind of curves with a very similar trend. Moreover, in the frequency range of the FEM analyses for the aircraft noise problem (around 500 Hz or below [22,32]), the differences between the two software are much smaller. The average values below 500 Hz for the box cavity will be around 2.5E-04% (max.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, the error is strongly affected by the frequency shifting of the pressure response and if the areas of the curves are compared, the total error is reduced to 0.052%, which is more accurate than the simple pressure value comparison for this kind of curves with a very similar trend. Moreover, in the frequency range of the FEM analyses for the aircraft noise problem (around 500 Hz or below [22,32]), the differences between the two software are much smaller. The average values below 500 Hz for the box cavity will be around 2.5E-04% (max.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The asymmetric structure was proved to be most beneficial, with only 1% weight gains and a lot more available area. C.Hesse [4] proposed and built a theoretical model that actively attenuates sounds within an enclosed right cylindrical composite fuselage using a series of actuators and sensors integrated into the structure. The main objective was to construct a general mathematical model which was applicable to a wide range of fuselage designs.…”
Section: Theoretical Analysis Of Aircraft Fuselagementioning
confidence: 99%