2010
DOI: 10.5721/itjrs201042310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active and passive remote sensing for supporting the evaluation of the urban seismic vulnerability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, apart from applications in post-earthquake impact assessments [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31], many studies have addressed the application of high-resolution remote sensing technology to pre-earthquake exposure, vulnerability, and risk. In these pre-earthquake studies, the and/or -relevant issues (see Equation (1)) of various buildings were widely discussed, including various optical imagery-based specific analyses (Table 1) [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50], some attempts at fusing optical imagery and LiDAR or SAR data [51][52][53] to help extract the heights of buildings, and several comprehensive reviews [54][55][56][57]. Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, apart from applications in post-earthquake impact assessments [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31], many studies have addressed the application of high-resolution remote sensing technology to pre-earthquake exposure, vulnerability, and risk. In these pre-earthquake studies, the and/or -relevant issues (see Equation (1)) of various buildings were widely discussed, including various optical imagery-based specific analyses (Table 1) [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50], some attempts at fusing optical imagery and LiDAR or SAR data [51][52][53] to help extract the heights of buildings, and several comprehensive reviews [54][55][56][57]. Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From an operational point of view, recent major disasters (e.g. 2010 Haiti earthquake, 2010 Pakistan Flood, 2011 Japan tsunami and 2012 Italy earthquake) [Ajmar et al, 2008[Ajmar et al, , 2011Mahendra et al, 2010;Baiocchi et al, 2012;Bhattacharya et al, 2013] clearly demonstrated the potential role of geomatics in supporting emergency response and recovery, as already depicted in different papers published by EuJRS [Ajmar et al, 2008[Ajmar et al, , 2011[Ajmar et al, , 2012Borfecchia et al, 2010;Dall'Osso et al, 2010;Pignatelli et al, 2010;Rivolta et al, 2010;Baiocchi et al, 2012;Laneve et al, 2012;Perez et al, 2012]. Remote sensing based analyses are nowadays frequently adopted to support both decision makers and responders in the field during disaster management activities, as clearly pointed out by the United Nations in the 2011 humanitarian appeal: " […] Remote sensing in the hours and days after the Haiti earthquake yielded estimates of numbers of severely affected people that stood the test of time and allowed an unusually rapid flash appeal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…For instance, Taubenböck (2015) characterize the built environment with remote sensing data and retrieve specific fragility functions or damage probability matrices, respectively, for designated building types. In contrast to that, e.g., Borfecchia et al (2010), and Geiß et al (2014Geiß et al ( , 2015 combine limited in situ ground truth building inventory data with features from remote sensing and use techniques of statistical inference for a complete labelling of the residual building inventory according to relevant vulnerability levels. Similar methodological principles were exploited by Wieland et al (2012), Pittore and Wieland (2013), and Geiß et al (2016) to assess seismic vulnerability on an aggregated spatial level to allow for covering larger areas.…”
Section: Third Phase: Methodological Elaboration Of Specific Aspects mentioning
confidence: 99%