2019
DOI: 10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.2019025657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active Agents and Fictive Kin: Learning From Pell-Eligible Engineering Students' Class Standpoint

Abstract: She investigates the historical and cultural dimensions of underrepresented groups' participation in science, technology and engineering and the reasons why white males still dominate these fields. Prof. Eve A. Riskin, University of Washington Eve Riskin received her BS degree in Electrical Engineering from M.I.T. and her graduate degrees in EE from Stanford. Since 1990, she has been in the EE Department at the University of Washington where she is now Associate Dean of Diversity and Access in the College of E… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lee and Hall developed initial propositions by clustering insights from the literature using sensitizing concepts and then crafting statements to summarize the resulting clusters. For example, insights related to the role of office hours (Briody et al, 2019), co‐curricular support (W. C. Lee & Matusovich, 2016), counterspaces (Ong et al, 2020), family (e.g., Arellano & Padilla, 1996; Carrigan et al, 2019), fictive kin (e.g., Carrigan et al, 2019; Simmons & Martin, 2014), peers (e.g., J. P. Martin et al, 2013; Ong et al, 2020), faculty (e.g., C. Newman, 2011), and other university personnel (e.g., J. P. Martin et al, 2013; Qaqish et al, 2020) are all related to the sensitizing concepts “Supplies” and “Characteristics of Delivery System.” After discussing this comparison, we drafted a proposition that focused on the breadth of support sources a student may turn to in a time of need, including people both within and beyond the university.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Lee and Hall developed initial propositions by clustering insights from the literature using sensitizing concepts and then crafting statements to summarize the resulting clusters. For example, insights related to the role of office hours (Briody et al, 2019), co‐curricular support (W. C. Lee & Matusovich, 2016), counterspaces (Ong et al, 2020), family (e.g., Arellano & Padilla, 1996; Carrigan et al, 2019), fictive kin (e.g., Carrigan et al, 2019; Simmons & Martin, 2014), peers (e.g., J. P. Martin et al, 2013; Ong et al, 2020), faculty (e.g., C. Newman, 2011), and other university personnel (e.g., J. P. Martin et al, 2013; Qaqish et al, 2020) are all related to the sensitizing concepts “Supplies” and “Characteristics of Delivery System.” After discussing this comparison, we drafted a proposition that focused on the breadth of support sources a student may turn to in a time of need, including people both within and beyond the university.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Familial and social networks must also be considered because student experiences are influenced by the personal relationships and resources accessible to them. The value or capital provided by parental support (Arellano & Padilla, 1996; Carrigan et al, 2019) and familial support more broadly (Ong et al, 2020) is not to be understated. In addition, peer networks or friends also aid students during their educational journey (Subethra & Nirmala, 2018).…”
Section: Conceptual Model Of Student Navigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the under-representation of women and students of colour in STEM is wellresearched [5,[22][23][24], there are significantly fewer discussions around the socio-economic diversity of the student body [25][26][27]. This is particularly troubling given that social classes in Westernized countries like Canada and Spain are largely distinguished by income levels.…”
Section: Socio-economic Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that this work uses a critical quantitative framework, there exists an assumption of a sys tem being oppressive unless quantitatively proven otherwise with statistically significant data. This assumption is a perfectly reasonable one, as existing research very well documents systemic structures that discriminate against students of marginalized backgrounds within the engineer ing educational space [3,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. Figure 2 uses a flowchart to demonstrate how this assumption enables the interpretation of our quantitative results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%