2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00577-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activation time and material stiffness of sequential removable orthodontic appliances. Part 2: Dental improvements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
10

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
27
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Eleven relevant publications were identified: four studies 5,10-12 were retrospective non-randomized, five studies 4,[13][14][15][16] were prospective non-randomized, and two studies 17,18 were prospective randomized. The article selection process is illustrated in the PRISMA Flow Diagram (Figure 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Eleven relevant publications were identified: four studies 5,10-12 were retrospective non-randomized, five studies 4,[13][14][15][16] were prospective non-randomized, and two studies 17,18 were prospective randomized. The article selection process is illustrated in the PRISMA Flow Diagram (Figure 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, PAR and OGS scores revealed that aligners were as successful as fixed appliances in controlling vertical buccal occlusion, even years after the end of treatment. 10,11,14,17 Thus, on the basis of the existing literature, CAT is not recommended to treat open bite.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Initially, the aligners were used successfully to deal with mild malocclusions, such as anterior crowding and generalized spacing. However, there were controversies over whether moderate to difficult orthodontic treatment could be systematically accomplished with the orthodontic aligner system [5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%