1998
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.142.6.1533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activation of the MKK/ERK Pathway during Somatic Cell Mitosis: Direct Interactions of Active ERK with Kinetochores and Regulation of the Mitotic 3F3/2 Phosphoantigen

Abstract: The mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathway, which includes extracellular signal–regulated protein kinases 1 and 2 (ERK1, ERK2) and MAP kinase kinases 1 and 2 (MKK1, MKK2), is well-known to be required for cell cycle progression from G1 to S phase, but its role in somatic cell mitosis has not been clearly established. We have examined the regulation of ERK and MKK in mammalian cells during mitosis using antibodies selective for active phosphorylated forms of these enzymes. In NIH 3T3 cells, both ERK and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

12
188
2
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
12
188
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, activation of the MEK/ERK pathway is required for exit from DNA damage-induced G2 cell cycle arrest (Abbott and Holt, 1999) and the transition from G2 into M (Lavoie et al, 1996;Wright et al, 1999). In addition, the localisation of active ERK to the mitotic kinetochore is also suggested to regulate proteins involved in chromosome segregation during metaphase to anaphase transition (Shapiro et al, 1998;Zecevic et al, 1998). Furthermore, ERK is also described to associate with kinetochores during early prophase, but this association is not apparent at later stages of mitosis (Knauf et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, activation of the MEK/ERK pathway is required for exit from DNA damage-induced G2 cell cycle arrest (Abbott and Holt, 1999) and the transition from G2 into M (Lavoie et al, 1996;Wright et al, 1999). In addition, the localisation of active ERK to the mitotic kinetochore is also suggested to regulate proteins involved in chromosome segregation during metaphase to anaphase transition (Shapiro et al, 1998;Zecevic et al, 1998). Furthermore, ERK is also described to associate with kinetochores during early prophase, but this association is not apparent at later stages of mitosis (Knauf et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides motor enzymes, a number of other proteins are at least transiently associated with kinetochores during mitosis. These include rod (Karess and Glover 1989; Starr et al, 1998), the MAP kinases ppERK (Shapiro et al 1998; Zecevic et al 1998) and ppMEK (Shapiro et al 1998), and an APC activator protein fizzy (called cdc20/cdh1 in other organisms; Kallio et al 1998). Likewise, the protein kinase polo (Logarinho and Sunkel 1998) and a number of components of the highly conserved spindle assembly checkpoint, including Bub1 (Taylor and McKeon 1997; Taylor et al 1998; Basu et al 1999), Bub3 (Taylor et al 1998; Basu et al 1998; Martinez-Exposito et al 1999), Mad1 (Jin et al 1998; Chen et al 1998), and Mad2 (Waters et al 1998; Chen et al 1996, Chen et al 1998), are transiently kinetochore-bound.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wood, and D.W. Cleveland, manuscript submitted for publication). CENP-E is also a target of phosphorylation by the map kinase ppERK, an active kinase found at the kinetochore (Shapiro et al 1998; Zecevic et al 1998). CENP-E has also been implicated in the dynamic attachment of kinetochores to disassembling microtubules in vitro (Lombillo et al 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MEK inhibition causes defects in both spindle formation (Horne and Guadagno, 2003) and spindle checkpoint control (Minshull et al, 1994;Takenaka et al, 1997;Chung and Chen, 2003). MEK1 is also active during mammalian somatic cell mitosis (Shapiro et al, 1998;Colanzi et al, 2000;Hayne et al, 2000;Roberts et al, 2002). Activation is independent of extracellular growth factor input (Dangi and Shapiro, 2005), and inhibition causes spindle defects (Horne and Guadagno, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%