Abstract:Recombination repair plays an important role in the processing of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) and DNA cross-links, and has been suggested to be mediated by the activation of the Fanconi anemia (FA)/BRCA pathway. Unlike DNA damage generated by ionizing radiation or DNA crosslinking, UV light-induced DNA damage is not commonly thought to require recombination for processing, as UV light does not directly induce DSBs or DNA cross-links. To elucidate the role of recombination repair in the cellular response to … Show more
“…As demonstrated previously (Dunn et al, 2006), physiological doses of SSL (containing 100, 200, or 300 J m À2 UVB) induces time-and dose-dependent monoubiquitination of the FANCD2 protein (Figure 1a Fibroblasts from patients with FANCA or FANCC were found not to be hypersensitive to UVB or to UVA (Supplementary Figure S1 online). As these cells are unable to ubiquitinate FANCD2 and to activate the FA/BRCA pathway in response to any stimulus, this indicates that a lack of FA/BRCA pathway activation does not increase acute toxicity of either UVB or UVA.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…As demonstrated previously (Dunn et al, 2006), a physiological dose of both SSL (containing 200 J m À2 UVB) and IR (10 Gy) induces nuclear foci of g-H2AX, although in a very different time-course and pattern. UVB-induced foci, in contrast to IR-induced ones, are only seen in a subset of cells and only with a delay of 45 minutes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…We recently reported activation of this pathway by UVB (Dunn et al, 2006). However, we provided evidence that this FA/BRCA pathway activation by UVB was not due to formation of DNA DSBs, but can be attributed to the presence and processing of stalled replication forks (Dunn et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…They are cytotoxic, contributing to genomic instability by promoting formation of deletions, insertions, or more complex mutations, and are repaired through homologous recombination or non-homologous end joining. We recently reported evidence that UVB, in contrast to ionizing radiation (IR), does not induce DNA DSBs, either directly or indirectly as repair intermediates (Dunn et al, 2006). Exposure to UVA generates singlet oxygen and may also generate oxygen radicals, including the hydroxyl radical through a Fenton reaction with nuclear-based metals (Darr and Fridovich, 1994;Petersen et al, 2000), but this has not been unequivocally shown.…”
Longwave UVA is an independent class I carcinogen. A complete understanding of UVA-induced DNA damage and how this damage is processed in skin cells is therefore of utmost importance. A particular question that has remained contentious is whether UVA induces DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), either directly or through processing of other types of DNA damage, such as recombination repair of replication forks stalled at DNA photoproducts. We therefore studied activation of the recombination repair pathway by solar available doses of UVA and assessed formation of DNA DSBs in primary skin fibroblasts. We found that, unlike ionizing radiation or UVB, UVA does not activate the Fanconi anemia/BRCA DNA damage response pathway or the "recombinase" RAD51 in primary skin fibroblasts. The fact that this pathway mediates recombination repair of DNA DSBs suggests that DNA DSBs are not formed by UVA. This is further supported by findings that UVA did not induce DNA DSBs, as assayed by neutral single-cell electrophoresis or by formation of γ-H2AX nuclear foci, considered the most sensitive assay for DNA DSBs. The lack of sufficient evidence for formation of DNA DSBs underlines the pivotal role of UVA-induced DNA photoproducts in UVA mutagenesis and carcinogenesis.
“…As demonstrated previously (Dunn et al, 2006), physiological doses of SSL (containing 100, 200, or 300 J m À2 UVB) induces time-and dose-dependent monoubiquitination of the FANCD2 protein (Figure 1a Fibroblasts from patients with FANCA or FANCC were found not to be hypersensitive to UVB or to UVA (Supplementary Figure S1 online). As these cells are unable to ubiquitinate FANCD2 and to activate the FA/BRCA pathway in response to any stimulus, this indicates that a lack of FA/BRCA pathway activation does not increase acute toxicity of either UVB or UVA.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…As demonstrated previously (Dunn et al, 2006), a physiological dose of both SSL (containing 200 J m À2 UVB) and IR (10 Gy) induces nuclear foci of g-H2AX, although in a very different time-course and pattern. UVB-induced foci, in contrast to IR-induced ones, are only seen in a subset of cells and only with a delay of 45 minutes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…We recently reported activation of this pathway by UVB (Dunn et al, 2006). However, we provided evidence that this FA/BRCA pathway activation by UVB was not due to formation of DNA DSBs, but can be attributed to the presence and processing of stalled replication forks (Dunn et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…They are cytotoxic, contributing to genomic instability by promoting formation of deletions, insertions, or more complex mutations, and are repaired through homologous recombination or non-homologous end joining. We recently reported evidence that UVB, in contrast to ionizing radiation (IR), does not induce DNA DSBs, either directly or indirectly as repair intermediates (Dunn et al, 2006). Exposure to UVA generates singlet oxygen and may also generate oxygen radicals, including the hydroxyl radical through a Fenton reaction with nuclear-based metals (Darr and Fridovich, 1994;Petersen et al, 2000), but this has not been unequivocally shown.…”
Longwave UVA is an independent class I carcinogen. A complete understanding of UVA-induced DNA damage and how this damage is processed in skin cells is therefore of utmost importance. A particular question that has remained contentious is whether UVA induces DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), either directly or through processing of other types of DNA damage, such as recombination repair of replication forks stalled at DNA photoproducts. We therefore studied activation of the recombination repair pathway by solar available doses of UVA and assessed formation of DNA DSBs in primary skin fibroblasts. We found that, unlike ionizing radiation or UVB, UVA does not activate the Fanconi anemia/BRCA DNA damage response pathway or the "recombinase" RAD51 in primary skin fibroblasts. The fact that this pathway mediates recombination repair of DNA DSBs suggests that DNA DSBs are not formed by UVA. This is further supported by findings that UVA did not induce DNA DSBs, as assayed by neutral single-cell electrophoresis or by formation of γ-H2AX nuclear foci, considered the most sensitive assay for DNA DSBs. The lack of sufficient evidence for formation of DNA DSBs underlines the pivotal role of UVA-induced DNA photoproducts in UVA mutagenesis and carcinogenesis.
“…For example, it was recently reported that ultraviolet (UV) light, which does not directly introduce DSBs or DNA interstrand cross-links, can activate the FA/BRCA pathway as evidenced by FANCD2 monoubiquitination [20]. In that study, it was suggested that the BRCA-FA pathway may be responsible for recombinational repair of stalled replication forks when nucleotide excision repair or translesion bypass fail.…”
Section: Brca-fa Dna Damage Response Pathwaymentioning
Promising research on DNA repair signaling pathways predicts a new age of anti-tumor drugs. This research was initiated through the discovery and characterization of proteins that functioned together in signaling pathways to sense, respond, and repair DNA damage. It was realized that tumor cells often lacked distinct DNA repair pathways, but simultaneously relied heavily on compensating pathways. More recently, researchers have begun to manipulate these compensating pathways to reign in and kill tumor cells. In a striking example it was shown that tumors derived from mutations in the DNA repair genes, of BRCA-FA pathway, were selectively sensitive to inhibition of the base excision repair pathway. These findings suggest that tumors derived from defects in DNA repair genes will be easier to treat clinically, providing a streamlined and targeted therapy that spares healthy cells. In the future, identifying patients with susceptible tumors and discovering additional DNA repair targets amenable to anti-tumor drugs will have a major impact on the course of cancer treatment.
KeywordsFanconi anemia; DNA repair; anti-tumor drug; BRCA
The DNA damage responseThe integrity of the genome is under constant attack from DNA damage. Even internal processes such as normal cellular metabolism create byproducts that wreak havoc on DNA. In some instances, DNA damage is severe enough to create a double strand break in the DNA helix. If breaks are not repaired, genes can be extensively rearranged and chromosomes can become unstable. To avoid this type of genomic instability, cells monitor DNA for signs of damage and respond by mounting a DNA damage response. The response is initiated by distortions in the DNA structure and eventually leads to activation of both cell cycle checkpoints and DNA damage repair pathways.Checkpoints can be triggered by DNA damage at several stages in the cell cycle, e.g., the G1 to S-phase and the G2 to M-phase boundaries. DNA damage can also arrest the replication of DNA within S phase, when new DNA is synthesized. Arresting DNA synthesis provides cells sufficient time to repair damaged DNA before progressing into G2 and M phases. Thus, cell cycle checkpoints cooperate with DNA repair processes to ensure that the genome replicates accurately. If, however, the damage is irreparable, the cell will activate an apoptotic response
Despite growing knowledge on the biological effects of ultraviolet (UV) radiation on human health and ecosystems, it is still difficult to predict the negative impacts of the increasing incidence of solar UV radiation in a scenario of global warming and climate changes. Hence, the development and application of DNA-based biological sensors to monitor the solar UV radiation under different environmental conditions is of increasing importance. With a mind to rendering a molecular view-point of the genotoxic impact of sunlight, field experiments were undertaken with a DNA-dosimeter system in parallel with physical photometry of solar UVB/UVA radiation, at various latitudes in South America. On applying biochemical and immunological approaches based on specific DNA-repair enzymes and antibodies, for evaluating sunlight-induced DNA damage profiles, it became clear that the genotoxic potential of sunlight does indeed vary according to latitude. Notwithstanding, while induction of oxidized DNA bases is directly dependent on an increase in latitude, the generation of 6-4PPs is inversely so, whereby the latter can be regarded as a biomolecular marker of UVB incidence. This molecular DNA lesion-pattern largely reflects the relative incidence of UVA and UVB energy at any specific latitude. Hereby is demonstrated the applicability of this DNA-based biosensor for additional, continuous field experiments, as a means of registering variations in the genotoxic impact of solar UV radiation. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 53:198-206, 2012. V V C 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.