Abstract:Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we measured regional blood flow to examine which motor areas of the human cerebral cortex are preferentially involved in an auditory conditional motor behavior. As a conditional motor task, randomly selected 330 or 660 Hz tones were presented to the subjects every 1. 0 s. The low and high tones indicated that the subjects should initiate three successive opposition movements by tapping together the right thumb and index finger or the right thumb and little fi… Show more
“…At the same time, other functional neuroimaging studies reported this same intersection of the SPS with the SFS to be the focus of premotor hand/ arm conditional activity (Deiber et al, 1997;Grafton et al, 1998;Toni et al, 1999;Kurata et al, 2000). These functional neuroimaging findings raised a major problem regarding our understanding of the organization of the dorsal premotor region of the human brain by failing to discriminate between the location of visuomotor hand conditional activity and the FEF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Lesions involving this region impair severely the learning and performance of visuomotor hand/arm conditional responses in both human subjects (Petrides, 1985(Petrides, , 1997Halsband and Freund, 1990) and the monkey (Halsband and Passingham, 1982;Petrides, 1982Petrides, , 1986. In addition, functional neuroimaging in normal human subjects has shown reliable activation related to the performance of visuomotor hand/arm conditional responses within the dorsal premotor cortex at the junction of the superior precentral sulcus (SPS) with the superior frontal sulcus (SFS) (Deiber et al, 1997;Grafton et al, 1998;Toni et al, 1999;Kurata et al, 2000). However, on the basis of functional neuroimaging studies, this same general region has also been reported to be the locus of the human homolog of the frontal eye field (FEF) (Paus, 1996;Petit et al, 1997;Corbetta et al, 1998;Luna et al, 1998;Petit and Haxby, 1999;Gagnon et al, 2002;Astafiev et al, 2003;Koyama et al, 2004;Grosbras et al, 2005).…”
A confusing picture of the functional organization of the dorsal premotor region of the human brain emerged when functional neuroimaging studies that either examined visuomotor hand conditional activity or attempted to localize the human frontal eye field reported activity increases at the same general location, namely the junction of the superior precentral sulcus with the superior frontal sulcus. The present functional magnetic resonance imaging study examined visuomotor hand conditional activity and the locus of the frontal eye field as defined by a standard task, on a subject-by-subject basis, to clarify their location and reveal relationships between the pattern of local morphology and functional activity. The results demonstrate that visuomotor hand conditional activity and the frontal eye field lie within distinct parts of the superior precentral sulcus, revealing an organization of the human premotor cortex consistent with that observed in experimental studies in the monkey.
“…At the same time, other functional neuroimaging studies reported this same intersection of the SPS with the SFS to be the focus of premotor hand/ arm conditional activity (Deiber et al, 1997;Grafton et al, 1998;Toni et al, 1999;Kurata et al, 2000). These functional neuroimaging findings raised a major problem regarding our understanding of the organization of the dorsal premotor region of the human brain by failing to discriminate between the location of visuomotor hand conditional activity and the FEF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Lesions involving this region impair severely the learning and performance of visuomotor hand/arm conditional responses in both human subjects (Petrides, 1985(Petrides, , 1997Halsband and Freund, 1990) and the monkey (Halsband and Passingham, 1982;Petrides, 1982Petrides, , 1986. In addition, functional neuroimaging in normal human subjects has shown reliable activation related to the performance of visuomotor hand/arm conditional responses within the dorsal premotor cortex at the junction of the superior precentral sulcus (SPS) with the superior frontal sulcus (SFS) (Deiber et al, 1997;Grafton et al, 1998;Toni et al, 1999;Kurata et al, 2000). However, on the basis of functional neuroimaging studies, this same general region has also been reported to be the locus of the human homolog of the frontal eye field (FEF) (Paus, 1996;Petit et al, 1997;Corbetta et al, 1998;Luna et al, 1998;Petit and Haxby, 1999;Gagnon et al, 2002;Astafiev et al, 2003;Koyama et al, 2004;Grosbras et al, 2005).…”
A confusing picture of the functional organization of the dorsal premotor region of the human brain emerged when functional neuroimaging studies that either examined visuomotor hand conditional activity or attempted to localize the human frontal eye field reported activity increases at the same general location, namely the junction of the superior precentral sulcus with the superior frontal sulcus. The present functional magnetic resonance imaging study examined visuomotor hand conditional activity and the locus of the frontal eye field as defined by a standard task, on a subject-by-subject basis, to clarify their location and reveal relationships between the pattern of local morphology and functional activity. The results demonstrate that visuomotor hand conditional activity and the frontal eye field lie within distinct parts of the superior precentral sulcus, revealing an organization of the human premotor cortex consistent with that observed in experimental studies in the monkey.
“…Its activity precedes that of the primary motor cortex in intentional movement (Weilke, 2001). In most of these studies that demonstrate the involvement of the SSMA in volition, auditory cues are chosen for external triggering of movements (e.g., Cunnington, 2002;Toma, 2003;Kurata, 2000).…”
Section: Clues To An Understanding Of Sensory Gatingmentioning
The filtering of sensory information, also referred to as "sensory gating", is impaired in various neuropsychiatric diseases. In the auditory domain, sensory gating is investigated mainly as a response decrease of the auditory evoked potential component P50 from one click to the second in a double click paradigm. In order to relate deficient sensory gating to anatomy, it is essential to identify the cortical structures involved in the generation of P50. However, the exact cerebral topography of P50 gating has remained largely unknown as yet. In a group of 17 patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, P50 was recorded invasively via subdural electrodes, and the topography of functionally indispensable ("eloquent") cortices was obtained by electrical stimulation mapping. These eloquent areas were involved in language, motor, and sensory functions. P50 could be identified in 13 patients in either temporal (n = 8) or midfrontal sites (n = 5). There were 6 occurrences (in 5 patients) of overlap of sites with maximal P50 responses and eloquent areas. Those were auditory (n = 1), supplementary sensorimotor (n = 3), primary motor (n = 1), and supplementary negative motor (n = 1). Results suggest that the early stage of sensory gating already involves a top-down modulation of sensory input by frontal areas.
“…2). Considerable controversy exists in the brain-imaging literature concerning results for conditional motor tasks, typically in the form of a specific motor act of the hand cued by either an auditory or visual stimulus (Deiber et al, 1997;Grafton et al, 1998;Kurata et al, 2000). Nearly all such studies elicit activity contralateral to the hand used and often more posteriorly in area 6.…”
A previous positron emission tomography (PET) study of musicians with and without absolute pitch put forth the hypothesis that the posterior dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is involved in the conditional associative aspect of the identification of a pitch. In the work presented here, we tested this hypothesis by training eight nonmusicians to associate each of four different complex musical sounds (triad chords) with an arbitrary number in a task designed to have limited analogy to absolute-pitch identification. Each subject underwent a functional magnetic resonance imaging scanning procedure both before and after training. Active condition (identification of chords)-control condition (amplitude-matched noise bursts) comparisons for the pretraining scan showed no significant activation maxima. The same comparison for the posttraining scan revealed significant peaks of activation in posterior dorsolateral prefrontal, ventrolateral prefrontal, and parietal areas. A conjunction analysis was performed to show that the posterior dorsolateral prefrontal activity in this study is similar to that observed in the aforementioned PET study. We conclude that the posterior dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is selectively involved in the conditional association aspect of our task, as it is in the attribution of a verbal label to a note by absolute-pitch musicians.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citationsâcitations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.