2002
DOI: 10.1210/mend.16.4.0816
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activation of the cAMP Pathway by the TSH Receptor Involves Switching of the Ectodomain from a Tethered Inverse Agonist to an Agonist

Abstract: Several lines of evidence indicate that constraining intramolecular interactions between transmembrane domains are required to maintain G protein-coupled receptors in an inactive conformation in the absence of agonist. For the glycoprotein hormone receptors, which harbor a long amino-terminal ectodomain responsible for hormone binding, it has been suggested that the ectodomain could contribute to these negative constraints. To test this hypothesis, we expressed at the surface of COS-7 cells mutants of the TSH … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
123
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
16
123
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We used 2 approaches to show that compound 2 binds to the serpentine domain of TSHR in contrast to the natural ligand TSH, which binds primarily to the large N-terminal ectodomain (31). We used a TSHR mutant that does not contain the N-terminal ectodomain and that was shown previously not to be activated by TSH (24) and showed that it was activated by compound 2. We also used a 3D homology model of TSHR (14,23), which was based on the x-ray crystallographic structure of opsin (25), to predict the binding pocket for the small-molecule agonist and predict the amino acid residues within the pocket that interact with compound 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We used 2 approaches to show that compound 2 binds to the serpentine domain of TSHR in contrast to the natural ligand TSH, which binds primarily to the large N-terminal ectodomain (31). We used a TSHR mutant that does not contain the N-terminal ectodomain and that was shown previously not to be activated by TSH (24) and showed that it was activated by compound 2. We also used a 3D homology model of TSHR (14,23), which was based on the x-ray crystallographic structure of opsin (25), to predict the binding pocket for the small-molecule agonist and predict the amino acid residues within the pocket that interact with compound 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To show that compound 2 binds to the serpentine domain, we tested the activation of a TSHR mutant in which the large amino-terminal ectodomain responsible for TSH binding was deleted. This truncated TSHR (KFLR) was shown by Vlaeminck-Guillem et al (24) not to bind or be activated by TSH. Compound 2 exhibited 12% lower efficacy and lower potency (EC 50 of 1.7 M) at KFLR than TSHR (Fig.…”
Section: Compound 2 Binds To the Transmembrane Helical Bundle Of Tshrmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Mutations were introduced in the hTSHr by site-directed mutagenesis as described previously (32). The primers are available upon request.…”
Section: Construction Of Tshr Mutantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas direct interaction between the agonist and different regions of the TMD takes place for the majority of GPCRs, a favoured current model holds that GpHr activation involves switching of the ECD from an inverse agonist into a tethered agonist of the TMD, on binding of the hormone 3,15 . This model provides a rational explanation to the observation that the TSHr can be activated by binding of ligands with little, if any sequence identity (TSH, thyrostimulin, autoantibodies) as well as by point mutation in a specific residue of the ECD 3,16,17 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%