2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2013.11.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activation of the alternative sigma factor SigB of Staphylococcus aureus following internalization by epithelial cells – An in vivo proteomics perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The roles of SarA in these in vivo studies cannot be compared because only Horsburgh et al (142) specifically investigated sarA expression levels. It is conceivable that B acts as a modulator of virulence in S. aureus, a conclusion that has been put forward by several authors (54,146,147) and is supported by a recent study that evaluated the role of B during intracellular growth of S. aureus in a host cell line (148). This study showed B -dependent changes in the expression of several genes at the mRNA and protein levels.…”
Section: B In Pathogenesissupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The roles of SarA in these in vivo studies cannot be compared because only Horsburgh et al (142) specifically investigated sarA expression levels. It is conceivable that B acts as a modulator of virulence in S. aureus, a conclusion that has been put forward by several authors (54,146,147) and is supported by a recent study that evaluated the role of B during intracellular growth of S. aureus in a host cell line (148). This study showed B -dependent changes in the expression of several genes at the mRNA and protein levels.…”
Section: B In Pathogenesissupporting
confidence: 52%
“…However, our finding that repression of the rbs operon by RbsR, but not activation of capsule, is controlled by ribose suggests that ribose is not likely an effector linking the two cellular processes. On the other hand, because RbsR is highly regulated by SigB, whose activity is affected by certain in vitro and in vivo stress conditions (53)(54)(55), stress signals that modulate SigB activity are likely to be important effectors for controlling the quantity of RbsR, thereby affecting ribose uptake and capsule production. However, determining which signals are involved and how transduction of these signals through SigB affects the expression of RbsR requires further indepth studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We carried out the experiments using the techniques described by Pfortner et al with some modifications (29). Bacterial internalizations were performed as described above.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%