1995
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp020802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activation of recombinant mouse acetylcholine receptors by acetylcholine, carbamylcholine and tetramethylammonium.

Abstract: 1. The kinetic properties of cloned mouse embryonic nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) expressed in HEK 293 cells or Xenopus oocytes were examined using high concentrations of acetylcholine (ACh), carbamylcholine (CCh), or tetramethylammonium (TMA). The rate constants of agonist binding and channel gating were estimated by fitting kinetic models to idealized open and closed intervals over a range of agonist concentrations. 2. Once doubly liganded, TMA‐activated receptors open at approximately 3000 s‐1. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
83
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
9
83
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4B) are evidence that the association of ACh to the transmitter binding site is not diffusionlimited, in which case perturbation of K d should mainly arise from changes in the dissociation rate constant rather than the association rate constant (⌽ binding ϳ 0). Similarly, high ⌽ binding values were found previously for a mutational series of AChR residue ␣Asp-152 (37), and for different agonists of WT AChRs (where agonist K d values are mainly determined by the k ϩ rate constant) (38). Further support for the idea that agonist binding requires a conformational change is that the association rate constant is not diffusion-limited.…”
Section: Mutations Of the Two Wsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4B) are evidence that the association of ACh to the transmitter binding site is not diffusionlimited, in which case perturbation of K d should mainly arise from changes in the dissociation rate constant rather than the association rate constant (⌽ binding ϳ 0). Similarly, high ⌽ binding values were found previously for a mutational series of AChR residue ␣Asp-152 (37), and for different agonists of WT AChRs (where agonist K d values are mainly determined by the k ϩ rate constant) (38). Further support for the idea that agonist binding requires a conformational change is that the association rate constant is not diffusion-limited.…”
Section: Mutations Of the Two Wsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Further support for the idea that agonist binding requires a conformational change is that the association rate constant is not diffusion-limited. The smaller agonist, tetramethylammonium ion, associates ϳ50 times more slowly than the larger ACh molecule (38). The experimental observations that agonists and the above-mentioned residues are bound-like in energy at the transition state for binding indicates that there is a conformational change associated with ligand binding, and at this transition state for this reaction (when the channel is still nonconducting) the ligand is in intimate contact with the protein.…”
Section: Mutations Of the Two Wmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The early findings showed that the fully occupied receptor switches between closed and open states very rapidly, occurring in tens of microseconds (Colquhoun and Sakmann, 1981), but there was uncertainty in assigning exponential components in the dwell time distributions to particular states in a kinetic scheme Steinbach, 1986, 1987). Eventually, by fitting descriptions such as Scheme 1 to dwell times obtained over a wide range of ACh concentrations, a complete set of rate constants governing receptor activation was achieved (Sine et al, 1990;Zhang et al, 1995). The measured rate constants indicated that ACh binds at a rate some 10-fold slower than the rate of diffusion, the rate of ACh dissociation from the Torpedo receptor differed markedly at the two binding sites (Sine et al, 1990), and opening of the receptor channel occurred within tens of microseconds (Maconochie et al, 1995).…”
Section: Early Advances (1980s Through 1990s)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kinetic analyses of single-channel and macroscopic function suggests that in the resting state, the affinity of ACh for the two sites differs by a factor of 30 (8). Experiments with partially assembled ␣␥ and ␣␦ dimers or with fully assembled, pentameric ␥-less or ␦-less receptors show that the ␣␦ site has the higher affinity for ACh or carbamylcholine (9)(10)(11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%