2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11095-022-03368-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activation of Inflammation by MCF-7 Cells-Derived Small Extracellular Vesicles (sEV): Comparison of Three Different Isolation Methods of sEV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different isolation methods have been developed including ultracentrifugation, density gradient centrifugation, and immunoaffinity capture, and they have own advantages and limitations. One of the major issues is the potential for contamination with non-exosomal components, such as proteins and lipoproteins, which affect downstream analyses and interpretation of results [11]. Another issue is the potential for loss or alteration of exosomal contents during isolation, which can affect their biological activity and potential clinical applications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different isolation methods have been developed including ultracentrifugation, density gradient centrifugation, and immunoaffinity capture, and they have own advantages and limitations. One of the major issues is the potential for contamination with non-exosomal components, such as proteins and lipoproteins, which affect downstream analyses and interpretation of results [11]. Another issue is the potential for loss or alteration of exosomal contents during isolation, which can affect their biological activity and potential clinical applications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%