Abstract:Apomorphine, a nonselective dopamine receptor agonist, facilitates penile erection and is effective in patients suffering from erectile dysfunction. The specific dopamine receptor subtype(s) responsible for its erectogenic effect is not known. Here we report that the dopamine D4 receptor plays a role in the regulation of penile function. ABT-724 is a selective dopamine D 4 receptor agonist that activates human dopamine D 4 receptors with an EC50 of 12.4 nM and 61% efficacy, with no effect on dopamine D 1, D2, … Show more
“…McCall et al (2005) reported a 200% increase in striatal acetylcholine release in rats at doses of sumanirole roughly equivalent to those which induced yawning. The two D4-preferring agonists, given at behaviorally active doses (Brioni et al 2004;Enguehard-Gueiffier et al 2006), did not produce either yawning or hypothermia suggesting that at these doses, they are devoid of significant D2 and D3 receptor agonist activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As shown in Figure 1, sumanirole induced significant increases in yawning, although these increases were relatively small and observed only at the highest dose, whereas significant decreases in core body temperature were observed at lower doses; sumanirole will subsequently be referred to as a D2-preferring agonist. The D4-preferring agonists, 077 (Figure 2), failed to induce significant levels of yawning or hypothermia over a wide range of behaviorally active doses (Brioni et al 2004;Enguehard-Gueiffier et al 2006) suggesting that, at these doses, they are devoid of agonist activity at the D3 and D2 receptors. D3 values, as well as the in vivo selectivity ratios for each of the agonists.…”
Section: Agonist-induced Yawning Behavior and Hypothermiamentioning
Rationale-Identification of behaviors specifically mediated by the dopamine D2 and D3 receptors would allow for the determination of in vivo receptor selectivity and aide the development of novel therapeutics for dopamine-related diseases.Objectives-These studies were aimed at evaluating the specific receptors involved in the mediation of D2/D3 agonist-induced yawning and hypothermia.Correspondence to: James H. Woods.
NIH Public AccessAuthor Manuscript Psychopharmacology (Berl) Methods-The relative potencies of a series of D2-like agonists to produce yawning and hypothermia were determined. The ability of D3-and D2-selective antagonists to inhibit the induction of yawning and hypothermia were assessed, and a series of D2/D3 antagonists were characterized with respect to their ability to alter yawning induced by a low and high dose of PD-128,907 as well as sumanirole-induced hypothermia.Results-D3-preferring agonists induced yawning at lower doses than those required to induce hypothermia, and the D2-preferring agonist, sumanirole, induced hypothermia at lower doses than were necessary to induce yawning. The rank order of D3 selectivity was pramipexole > PD-128,907 = 7-OH-DPAT = quinpirole = quinelorane > apomorphine = U91356A. Sumanirole had only D2 agonist effects. PG01037, SB-277011A and U99194 were all D3-selective antagonists, whereas haloperidol and L-741,626 were D2-selective antagonists and nafadotride's profile of action was more similar to the D2 antagonists than to the D3 antagonists.Conclusions-D3 and D2 receptors have specific roles in the mediation of yawning and hypothermia, respectively, and the analysis of these effects allow inferences to be made regarding the selectivity of D2/D3 agonists and antagonists with respect to their actions at D2 and D3 receptors.
“…McCall et al (2005) reported a 200% increase in striatal acetylcholine release in rats at doses of sumanirole roughly equivalent to those which induced yawning. The two D4-preferring agonists, given at behaviorally active doses (Brioni et al 2004;Enguehard-Gueiffier et al 2006), did not produce either yawning or hypothermia suggesting that at these doses, they are devoid of significant D2 and D3 receptor agonist activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As shown in Figure 1, sumanirole induced significant increases in yawning, although these increases were relatively small and observed only at the highest dose, whereas significant decreases in core body temperature were observed at lower doses; sumanirole will subsequently be referred to as a D2-preferring agonist. The D4-preferring agonists, 077 (Figure 2), failed to induce significant levels of yawning or hypothermia over a wide range of behaviorally active doses (Brioni et al 2004;Enguehard-Gueiffier et al 2006) suggesting that, at these doses, they are devoid of agonist activity at the D3 and D2 receptors. D3 values, as well as the in vivo selectivity ratios for each of the agonists.…”
Section: Agonist-induced Yawning Behavior and Hypothermiamentioning
Rationale-Identification of behaviors specifically mediated by the dopamine D2 and D3 receptors would allow for the determination of in vivo receptor selectivity and aide the development of novel therapeutics for dopamine-related diseases.Objectives-These studies were aimed at evaluating the specific receptors involved in the mediation of D2/D3 agonist-induced yawning and hypothermia.Correspondence to: James H. Woods.
NIH Public AccessAuthor Manuscript Psychopharmacology (Berl) Methods-The relative potencies of a series of D2-like agonists to produce yawning and hypothermia were determined. The ability of D3-and D2-selective antagonists to inhibit the induction of yawning and hypothermia were assessed, and a series of D2/D3 antagonists were characterized with respect to their ability to alter yawning induced by a low and high dose of PD-128,907 as well as sumanirole-induced hypothermia.Results-D3-preferring agonists induced yawning at lower doses than those required to induce hypothermia, and the D2-preferring agonist, sumanirole, induced hypothermia at lower doses than were necessary to induce yawning. The rank order of D3 selectivity was pramipexole > PD-128,907 = 7-OH-DPAT = quinpirole = quinelorane > apomorphine = U91356A. Sumanirole had only D2 agonist effects. PG01037, SB-277011A and U99194 were all D3-selective antagonists, whereas haloperidol and L-741,626 were D2-selective antagonists and nafadotride's profile of action was more similar to the D2 antagonists than to the D3 antagonists.Conclusions-D3 and D2 receptors have specific roles in the mediation of yawning and hypothermia, respectively, and the analysis of these effects allow inferences to be made regarding the selectivity of D2/D3 agonists and antagonists with respect to their actions at D2 and D3 receptors.
“…782 Interestingly, normal aging in all mammalian species is associated with reduced levels of dopamine and increasing sexual dysfunction, whereas dopamine agonists enhance sexual function in both rodents and humans. 783,784 The management of male sexual dysfunction in patients with PD involves identifying and correcting any underlying treatable causes, and introducing pharmacologic therapy aimed at improving erectile function. Previously untreated or undertreated patients with PD may find that antiparkinsonian treatment helps sexual function, possibly by alleviating bradykinesia or by restoring dopaminergic tone.…”
Section: Impulse Dyscontrol and Dopamine Dysregulation Disordersmentioning
Parkinson disease (PD) is an age-related neurodegenerative disorder that affects as many as 1-2% of persons aged 60 years and older. With the aging of the population, the frequency of PD is expected to increase dramatically in the coming decades. Current therapy is largely based on a dopamine replacement strategy, primarily using the dopamine precursor levodopa. However, chronic treatment is associated with the development of motor complications, and the disease is inexorably progressive. Further, advancing disease is associated with the emergence of features such as freezing, falling, and dementia which are not adequately controlled with dopaminergic therapies. Indeed, it is now appreciated that these nondopaminergic features are common and the major source of disability for patients with advanced disease. Many different therapeutic agents and treatment strategies have been evaluated over the past several years to try and address these unmet medical needs, and many promising approaches are currently being tested in the laboratory and in the clinic. As a result, there are now many new therapies and strategic approaches available for the treatment of the different stages of PD, with which the treating physician must be familiar in order to provide patients with optimal care. This monograph provides an overview of the management of PD patients, with an emphasis on pathophysiology, and the results of recent clinical trials. It is intended to provide physicians with an understanding of the different treatment options that are available for managing the different stages of the disease and the scientific rationale of the different approaches. 1 PD is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder, with an average age at onset of about 60 years. An estimated 5 million people throughout the world have PD, with 1 million individuals each in the United States and in Europe with the disorder. PD affects approximately 0.3% of the population and 1% to 2% of those older than 60 years.2 With the aging of the population and the substantial increase in the number of at-risk individuals older than 60 years, it is anticipated that the prevalence of PD will increase dramatically in the coming decades.
“…Adding to the complexity, apomorphine, as a non-selective dopaminergic receptor agonist, affects several types of dopaminergic receptors among them D 1 , D 2 and D 4 (Brioni and Moreland, 2006;Brioni et al, 2004;Melis et al, 2005Melis et al, , 2006Schechter and Greer, 1987), whereas chronic treatment with apomorphine may change the balance between dopamine D 1 and D 2 receptors, favoring the D 1 type (Acerbo et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the role of dopamine D 1 vs D 2 receptors is complex (Hull et al, 1992) and hard to define, because of conflicting findings (Paredes and Agmo, 2004). The possible involvement of dopamine D 4 receptors in the pro-erectile effects of apomorphine Brioni et al, 2004;Hsieh et al, 2004) may shed new light on the existing confusing situation.…”
Apomorphine is a non-selective dopaminergic receptor agonist. Because of its pro-erectile effects, apomorphine is clinically used for treatment of erectile dysfunction. We investigated the effects of subcutaneous apomorphine administration (0.4 mg/kg rat) on sexual behavior and matinginduced Fos-expression following acute (day 1) or chronic apomorphine treatment (days 8 and 15) in sexually experienced male rats. Consistent facilitatory effects of apomorphine were observed in the reduced numbers of mounts and intromissions over time and an increased ejaculation frequency on day 1. The first post-ejaculatory interval, however, was lengthened, while other behavioral parameters were unaffected. Fosimmunoreactivity induced by acute apomorphine administration (barrel cortex, paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus, central amygdala and locus coeruleus) was strongly reduced after chronic administration. After mating, induction of Fos-immunoreactivity was observed in well-known areas like medial preoptic nucleus and the posterodorsal medial amygdaloid area. Apomorphine, however, reduced mating-induced Fosimmunoreactivity in the nucleus accumbens shell and prevented its occurrence in its core area. This remarkable apomorphine effect was not observed in any other brain area. We conclude that the behavioral (pro-erectile) effects of apomorphine are consistent over time, and that the diminished accumbens-Fos-immunoreactivity and the elongated post-ejaculatory interval may reflect a decreased response to remote cues from the estrus female.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.