1990
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.87.10.3708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activation of ara operons by a truncated AraC protein does not require inducer.

Abstract: The araC gene of Escherichia coli encodes a protein that binds the inducer L-arabinose to activate the transcription of three ara operons. In a study to determine the functional domains within the AraC protein, we have generated a set of overlapping deletions from the proximal end of the araC gene. We found that the removal of up to nearly 60% of the coding sequence of this protein still allows transcriptional activation of the ara operons in vivo, up to 27% that of the wild type. These truncated proteins, how… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

1992
1992
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the exact mechanism by which arabinose causes induction of the system is unclear, it appears that arabinose interacts directly with AraC, causing a conformational change in the protein which ameliorates loop formation and enhances binding to adjacent half sites (araI 1 and araI 2 ) whose occupancy facilitates ara gene expression (35,36). Evidence suggests that arabinose (the so-called effector) interacts with the N-terminal portion of the protein, while the C-terminal domain mediates binding to the DNA (37). This property appears to be shared by other members of the AraC family of regulators (45).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the exact mechanism by which arabinose causes induction of the system is unclear, it appears that arabinose interacts directly with AraC, causing a conformational change in the protein which ameliorates loop formation and enhances binding to adjacent half sites (araI 1 and araI 2 ) whose occupancy facilitates ara gene expression (35,36). Evidence suggests that arabinose (the so-called effector) interacts with the N-terminal portion of the protein, while the C-terminal domain mediates binding to the DNA (37). This property appears to be shared by other members of the AraC family of regulators (45).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The activity of several regulatory proteins is masked by an inhibitory domain on the same protein (Godowski et al 1987;Hollenberg et al 1987;Menon and Lee 1990;Choi and Greenberg 1991). For these proteins, deletion of the inhibitory region results in a constitutively active transcription factor.…”
Section: Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The steroid hormone binding domain of the glucocorticoid receptor inhibits this protein's activity as a transcriptional enhancer in the absence of hormone (Godowski et al 1987;Hollenberg et al 1987). The AraC and LuxR transcriptional activators contain amino-terminal regions that inhibit the ability of these proteins to activate transcription in the absence of their respective inducer molecules (Menon and Lee 1990;Choi and Greenberg 1991). In addition, the major cr factor of Escherichia coli contains a region that masks the ability of free cr z~ to bind DNA (Dombroski et al 1992), and inhibition of DNA binding by this region is presumably relieved by interaction of cr with core RNA polymerase.…”
Section: Spooa Transcription Factor Contains An Inhibitory Amino-termmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Repression is a common mechanism by which the intrinsic activity of different families of prokaryotic transcriptional activators are kept silent until the activities of the genes they control are required. For example, the normal activating signal is not required when various portions of AraC (Menon and Lee, 1990), FixJ (Kahn and Ditta, 1991), LuxR (Choi and Greenberg, 1991) or Spo0A (Ireton et al, 1993) are deleted. Similarly, the DNA binding properties of 70 and related sigma factors are also under repression control (Dombroski et al, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%