1986
DOI: 10.1128/mcb.6.5.1571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activation of a cryptic TACTAAC box in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae actin intron.

Abstract: We constructed a translational fusion between the Saccharomyces cerevisiae actin gene and the Escherichia coli (-galactosidase structural gene such that expression of 0-galactosidase activity required accurate splicing of the actin intron. Using this chimeric gene, we generated a series of internal deletions which removed the TACTAAC box or, in addition, TACTAAC-like sequences within the intron. Analysis of the fusion transcripts produced in these deletions allowed us to conclude that the TACTAAC-like sequence… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). Previously we demonstrated that the same sequence at the normal ICS position still allows fairly efficient splicing (9), whereas others have shown that this upstream cryptic TACTAAG is used for branch formation, albeit inefficiently, only if the actin ICS is deleted (6) or contains a C-to-A transversion at the third position (39). Other ICS mutations prevent use of the upstream TACTAAG (9,39).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1). Previously we demonstrated that the same sequence at the normal ICS position still allows fairly efficient splicing (9), whereas others have shown that this upstream cryptic TACTAAG is used for branch formation, albeit inefficiently, only if the actin ICS is deleted (6) or contains a C-to-A transversion at the third position (39). Other ICS mutations prevent use of the upstream TACTAAG (9,39).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other ICS mutations prevent use of the upstream TACTAAG (9,39). This inefficient use of the upstream TACTAAG sequence (6,39), as compared with the relatively efficient use of a TACTAAG mutation at the ICS (9), suggests that subtle changes in sequence context may effect the recognition of a potential branchpoint. The data of Pikielny and Rosbash (28) demonstrate that alterations adjacent to either the 5' conserved junction sequence or the ICS can dramatically effect the efficiency of stage 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Splicing activities of the reconstituted extracts were then assayed using wildtype (WT), A256, and A257 actin pre-mRNA substrates. All of the pre-mRNA substrates used in this experiment contained the A6 mutation, which removes a cryptic branchpoint sequence (UACUAAG) that can be used on mutation of the normal branch site:,sequence (Vijayraghavan et al 1986;Cellini et al 1986). With the WT actin pre-mRNA substrate, substantial splicing activity is seen only with the T7U2(WT) RNA.…”
Section: In Vitro Suppression Of Branch Site Mutationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevyisiae, highly conserved sequences at the 5' splice site (GTATGT), 3' splice site (PyAG), and internal branch acceptor site (TACTAAC) have been documented as structural requirements for correct and efficient removal of introns from mRNA precursors (9,12,18,19,30,31,35). These highly conserved elements hatve been subject to intense study (7,11,19,24,28,38), whereas only little is known about the nonconserved sequences in yeast introns. Cellini et al reported that a 15-base-pair (bp) deletion between the internal branch acceptor site and the 3' splice site of the yeast actin intron has no effect on splicing (6); a deletion of 170 nucleotides which leaves intact the first 13 nucleotides at the 5' splice junction and most of the 3' part of this intron also does not adversely affect splicing (12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%