1990
DOI: 10.2307/3869239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activation of a Bean Chitinase Promoter in Transgenic Tobacco Plants by Phytopathogenic Fungi

Abstract: The temporal and spatial expression of a bean chitinase promoter has been investigated in response to fungal attack. Analysis of transgenic tobacco plants containing a chimeric gene composed of a 1.7-kilobase fragment carrying the chitinase 5B gene promoter fused to the coding region of the gus A gene indicated that the chitinase promoter is activated during attack by the fungal pathogens Botrytis cinerea, Rhizoctonia solani, and Sclerotium rolfsii. Although induction of 8-glucuronidase activity was observed i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was hypothesized that plant chitinases can degrade chitin in the fungal cell walls to directly affect the viability of the invading fungal pathogen and to release short chitin fragments (chitooligosaccharides) that can act as a general elicitor of plant innate immunity (Boller, 1995;Stacey and Shibuya, 1997;Shibuya and Minami, 2001;Passarinho and de Vries, 2002). This hypothesis is indirectly supported by the following observations: a number of chitinase genes are induced by fungal infection (Majeau et al, 1990;Roby et al, 1990), and chitinases accumulate at infection sites in planta (Wubben et al, 1992). Chitinases were also shown to degrade fungal cell walls and inhibit fungal growth in vitro, especially in combination with b-1,3-glucanases (Schlumbaum et al, 1986;Mauch et al, 1988;Arlorio et al, 1992;van den Burg et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…It was hypothesized that plant chitinases can degrade chitin in the fungal cell walls to directly affect the viability of the invading fungal pathogen and to release short chitin fragments (chitooligosaccharides) that can act as a general elicitor of plant innate immunity (Boller, 1995;Stacey and Shibuya, 1997;Shibuya and Minami, 2001;Passarinho and de Vries, 2002). This hypothesis is indirectly supported by the following observations: a number of chitinase genes are induced by fungal infection (Majeau et al, 1990;Roby et al, 1990), and chitinases accumulate at infection sites in planta (Wubben et al, 1992). Chitinases were also shown to degrade fungal cell walls and inhibit fungal growth in vitro, especially in combination with b-1,3-glucanases (Schlumbaum et al, 1986;Mauch et al, 1988;Arlorio et al, 1992;van den Burg et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Similar studies have shown that all the elements needed for correct hormonal, developmentaf and pathogenesis regulated expression are present in a ""'1.6 kb 5'-fragment of the tobacco ~-1,3-glucanase gene GLB (R. Vogeli-Lange et al, 1991). A 1.7 kb fragment from the 5'-region of the bean chitinase gene 5B was sufficient for induction of GUS in response to infection with fungal pathogens and treatment with ethylene (Broglie et al, 1989;Roby et al, 1990). Deletion analysis of this fragment showed that the sequence between -422 and -195 upstream of the transcriptional start site is important both for constitutive expression and ethylene-induced expression (Broglie et al, 1989).…”
Section: '-Flanking Sequencementioning
confidence: 96%
“…TissuespeciJic expression of defense responses has been studied by quantifying various defense responses, enzyme activities, and mRNA amounts, after localized tissue sampling (Bell et al 1986;Schroder et al 1992;Meier et al 1993), by in situ localization of proteins and mRNA in sections of infectcd tissues (Somssich et al 1988;Schmelzer et al 1989;Taylor et al 1990;Benhamou 1993;Kombrink et al 1993a), or by histochemical analysis of the products of reporter genes driven by promoters of defense-related genes in transgenic plants (Castresana et al 1990;Roby et al 1990;Samac and Shah 1991;Hennig et al 1993;Martini et al 1993;Warner et al 1993). In general, these studies show that the patterns of expression and localization of PR proteins and transcripts differ greatly.…”
Section: Expression Patterns In Infected Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%