2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.05.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activation induced changes in GABA: Functional MRS at 7 T with MEGA-sLASER

Abstract: Functional magnetic resonance spectroscopy (fMRS) has been used to assess the dynamic metabolic responses of the brain to a physiological stimulus non-invasively. However, only limited information on the dynamic functional response of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), the primary inhibitory neurotransmitter in the brain, is available. We aimed to measure the activation-induced changes in GABA unambiguously using a spectral editing method, instead of the conventional direct detection techniques used in previous fMRS … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

10
66
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
10
66
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with the one previous study highligh ng reduced MRS-assessed GABA concentra ons in human M1 observed during a force-tracking learning task but not in an analogous Movement condi on (Floyer-Lea, 2006). However, these results are in contrast to a recent study repor ng evidence of a reduc on in MRS measures of GABA during a bi-manual whole-hand clench task (Chen et al, 2017). In light of differences in the rela ve balance of le and right M1 in the context of unimanual versus bimanual tasks (Koeneke et al, 2004), it is difficult to interpret the present results in the context of this study, where the concentra on of M1 GABA change may be impacted by a mixture top-down signals and M1-M1 interhemispheric signals that differs from those occurring in a unimanual task.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This finding is consistent with the one previous study highligh ng reduced MRS-assessed GABA concentra ons in human M1 observed during a force-tracking learning task but not in an analogous Movement condi on (Floyer-Lea, 2006). However, these results are in contrast to a recent study repor ng evidence of a reduc on in MRS measures of GABA during a bi-manual whole-hand clench task (Chen et al, 2017). In light of differences in the rela ve balance of le and right M1 in the context of unimanual versus bimanual tasks (Koeneke et al, 2004), it is difficult to interpret the present results in the context of this study, where the concentra on of M1 GABA change may be impacted by a mixture top-down signals and M1-M1 interhemispheric signals that differs from those occurring in a unimanual task.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic analysis of GABA and Glx revealed that the difference in GABA was largest early in the scan, whereas for Glx difference appeared to be relatively stable throughout. These results are broadly consistent with previous work (Bednařík et al, 2015;Chen et al, 2017;Lin, Stephenson, Xin, Napolitano, & Morris, 2012); however, whereas we found early differences in GABA, i.e., in the first 7 min of stimulation, (Chen et al, 2017) found the maximum difference after 5 min of hand-clenching. The distinct time courses found for GABA and Glx when viewing single-/mixed-polarity stereograms may reflect differences in the extent to which inhibitory/excitatory systems were engaged.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, these results are in contrast to a recent study reporting evidence of a reduction in MRS measures of GABA during a bi‐manual whole‐hand clench task (Chen et al . ). In light of differences in the relative balance of left and right M1 in the context of unimanual versus bimanual tasks (Koeneke et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%