2022
DOI: 10.1080/21663831.2022.2114814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activation energy of diffusion determined from a single in-situ neutron reflectometry experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As discussed above, eq can be used to approximately calculate the activation energy and the prefactor for small diffusion times (small range of temperatures). Figure shows the variation of the integrated and normalized intensity of the Bragg peak of the experimental data with the annealing time less than 3500 s. It is evident that the integrated and normalized intensity of the Bragg peak is nearly a linear function of the annealing time. According to eq and the experimental data shown in Figure , the term of t 2 in eq is thus negligible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As discussed above, eq can be used to approximately calculate the activation energy and the prefactor for small diffusion times (small range of temperatures). Figure shows the variation of the integrated and normalized intensity of the Bragg peak of the experimental data with the annealing time less than 3500 s. It is evident that the integrated and normalized intensity of the Bragg peak is nearly a linear function of the annealing time. According to eq and the experimental data shown in Figure , the term of t 2 in eq is thus negligible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using linear-regression fitting to fit the experimental data in Figure , we obtain a slope of −8.6 × 10 –6 s –1 , i.e., χ­(593 K) = −8.6 × 10 –6 s –1 , which is comparable to −6.5 × 10 –6 s –1 obtained from eq with D 0 = 19.95 × 10 –4 m 2 /s and Q = 2.20 eV. Note that the numerical values of D 0 = 19.95 × 10 –4 m 2 /s and Q = 2.20 eV fall in the ranges of D 0 = 1.55 –1.3 +18.4 × 10 –4 m 2 /s and Q = 2.29 –0.15 +0.17 eV given by Hüger et al…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations