2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.12.144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activating Co sites activity in Co(OH)2 via VN coupling to facilitate highly efficient oxygen evolution reaction

Jing Tang,
Wenjian Wan,
Siyuan Liu
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Table S2, the performance of CMP-Py­(Co)@Co is competitive to and even better than other excellent porous polymer-based catalysts previously reported in the literature, such as COF-C4N (η 10 = 349 mV vs RHE), C4-SHz COF (η 10 = 320 mV vs RHE), Co 0.5 V 0.5 @COF-SO 3 (η 10 = 300 mV vs RHE), FeCoSe@NCNSs (η 10 = 320 mV vs RHE), FeCo@SNC (η 10 = 330 mV vs RHE), CoTIPP@CNT-2 (η 10 = 363 mV vs RHE), and ZJUT-1@Co (η 10 = 295 mV vs RHE) . In addition, the overpotential of CMP-Py­(Co)@Co is comparable to that of many other excellent OECs reported recently, such as Ni x Co 1– x @Ni x Co 1– x O/NCNT (η 10 = 380 mV vs RHE), NiMoC-NCNTs (η 10 = 310 mV vs RHE), and Co­(OH) 2 /VN@C (η 10 = 319 mV vs RHE) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in Table S2, the performance of CMP-Py­(Co)@Co is competitive to and even better than other excellent porous polymer-based catalysts previously reported in the literature, such as COF-C4N (η 10 = 349 mV vs RHE), C4-SHz COF (η 10 = 320 mV vs RHE), Co 0.5 V 0.5 @COF-SO 3 (η 10 = 300 mV vs RHE), FeCoSe@NCNSs (η 10 = 320 mV vs RHE), FeCo@SNC (η 10 = 330 mV vs RHE), CoTIPP@CNT-2 (η 10 = 363 mV vs RHE), and ZJUT-1@Co (η 10 = 295 mV vs RHE) . In addition, the overpotential of CMP-Py­(Co)@Co is comparable to that of many other excellent OECs reported recently, such as Ni x Co 1– x @Ni x Co 1– x O/NCNT (η 10 = 380 mV vs RHE), NiMoC-NCNTs (η 10 = 310 mV vs RHE), and Co­(OH) 2 /VN@C (η 10 = 319 mV vs RHE) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…64 In addition, the overpotential of CMP-Py(Co)@Co is comparable to that of many other excellent OECs reported recently, such as Ni x Co 1−x @Ni x Co 1−x O/NCNT (η 10 = 380 mV vs RHE), 65 NiMoC-NCNTs (η 10 = 310 mV vs RHE), 66 and Co(OH) 2 /VN@C (η 10 = 319 mV vs RHE). 67 The OER kinetics of CMPs were evaluated by Tafel slopes and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. 68 The Tafel slope value of CMP-Py(Co)@Co is 80.1 mV dec −1 , lower than that of CMP-Py(Co) (96.8 mV dec −1 ) and RuO 2 (87.6 mV dec −1 ) (Figure 4b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%