Abstract:a b s t r a c tWe attempted to use feathers for the production of activated carbon (AC). A water-soluble resol-type phenolic resin was hybridized to prevent the liquefaction of the feathers and to control the graphitization degree of charcoal. The hybridization could effectively increase the yield of charcoal over 30% and maintained the graphitization degree at approximately 0.1, suitable for the production of AC. The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area and the iodine-adsorption capacity of hybrid charco… Show more
“…The hybridization could effectively increase the yield of charcoal by over 30% and maintained the graphitization degree at approximately 0.1, suitable for the production of AC. They reported the production of materials with a surface area and iodine-adsorption capacity of 706 m 2 /g and 550 mg/g, respectively, almost twice as high in resin-free carbonized feather materials [255]. Kawahara also used similar systems to produce well-defined precursor fibres with nanoscale diameter for carbon nanofibers using electrospinning with resol-phenol formaldehyde resin, keratin and PVOH dissolved in water as the spinning dope.…”
Among the biopolymers from animal sources, keratin is one the most abundant, with a major contribution from side stream products from cattle, ovine and poultry industry, offering many opportunities to produce cost-effective and sustainable advanced materials. Although many reviews have discussed the application of keratin in polymer-based biomaterials, little attention has been paid to its potential in association with other polymer matrices. Thus, herein, we present an extensive literature review summarizing keratin’s compatibility with other synthetic, biosynthetic and natural polymers, and its effect on the materials’ final properties in a myriad of applications. First, we revise the historical context of keratin use, describe its structure, chemical toolset and methods of extraction, overview and differentiate keratins obtained from different sources, highlight the main areas where keratin associations have been applied, and describe the possibilities offered by its chemical toolset. Finally, we contextualize keratin’s potential for addressing current issues in materials sciences, focusing on the effect of keratin when associated to other polymers’ matrices from biomedical to engineering applications, and beyond.
“…The hybridization could effectively increase the yield of charcoal by over 30% and maintained the graphitization degree at approximately 0.1, suitable for the production of AC. They reported the production of materials with a surface area and iodine-adsorption capacity of 706 m 2 /g and 550 mg/g, respectively, almost twice as high in resin-free carbonized feather materials [255]. Kawahara also used similar systems to produce well-defined precursor fibres with nanoscale diameter for carbon nanofibers using electrospinning with resol-phenol formaldehyde resin, keratin and PVOH dissolved in water as the spinning dope.…”
Among the biopolymers from animal sources, keratin is one the most abundant, with a major contribution from side stream products from cattle, ovine and poultry industry, offering many opportunities to produce cost-effective and sustainable advanced materials. Although many reviews have discussed the application of keratin in polymer-based biomaterials, little attention has been paid to its potential in association with other polymer matrices. Thus, herein, we present an extensive literature review summarizing keratin’s compatibility with other synthetic, biosynthetic and natural polymers, and its effect on the materials’ final properties in a myriad of applications. First, we revise the historical context of keratin use, describe its structure, chemical toolset and methods of extraction, overview and differentiate keratins obtained from different sources, highlight the main areas where keratin associations have been applied, and describe the possibilities offered by its chemical toolset. Finally, we contextualize keratin’s potential for addressing current issues in materials sciences, focusing on the effect of keratin when associated to other polymers’ matrices from biomedical to engineering applications, and beyond.
“…However, original carbon fiber materials are relatively expensive to obtain, and this can become a limiting factor in the development of 3D carbon fiber–based structures on a large scale ( 10 ). Although hydrothermal treatment of diverse proteins usually induces their decomposition without forming carbonaceous materials ( 11 ), such structural fiber-based proteins as keratin ( 12 ) and collagen ( 13 ) as well as silk ( 14 , 15 ) have been reported as suitable for carbonization between 200° and 800°C, and in some cases even up to 2800°C ( 16 ). However, with the exception of some millimeter-scale silk nanofiber membranes ( 15 ) and up to 2-cm-large flexible carbonized silk worm cocoons ( 14 ), there are no reports on sponge-like and ready-to-use carbon scaffolds with hierarchical pores and 3D-connected skeletons.…”
Fabrication of biomimetic materials and scaffolds is usually a micro- or even nanoscale process; however, most testing and all manufacturing require larger-scale synthesis of nanoscale features. Here, we propose the utilization of naturally prefabricated three-dimensional (3D) spongin scaffolds that preserve molecular detail across centimeter-scale samples. The fine-scale structure of this collagenous resource is stable at temperatures of up to 1200°C and can produce up to 4 × 10–cm–large 3D microfibrous and nanoporous turbostratic graphite. Our findings highlight the fact that this turbostratic graphite is exceptional at preserving the nanostructural features typical for triple-helix collagen. The resulting carbon sponge resembles the shape and unique microarchitecture of the original spongin scaffold. Copper electroplating of the obtained composite leads to a hybrid material with excellent catalytic performance with respect to the reduction of p-nitrophenol in both freshwater and marine environments.
“…The yield of PVA-based charcoal at 800°C was no more than 5% [13]. Therefore, considering the composition of the cast film, the carbon yield exceeding 30% seems to be brought about by the co-carbonization effect between the w-ph and w-fk [8].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…W-fk tends to self-assemble as the solvent water vaporizes [7]. Moreover, L-proline contained in w-fk will promote the carbonization of resolphenol formaldehyde resin through co-carbonization reactions [8], which is attractive when the as-electrospun fibers are converted into CNFs through carbonization. It was found that the spinning dope hybridizing w-fk to the amount of 30%, i.e.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.