2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activated alumina sludge as partial substitute for fine aggregates in brick making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sludge was introduced in the amount of 5% of the weight of the initial clay. According to published data [ 21 , 22 , 23 ], WTP sludge was introduced into clay in an amount of 5% to 40%. In this study, the minimum value for a preliminary assessment of the effectiveness of the WTP sludge was chosen.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sludge was introduced in the amount of 5% of the weight of the initial clay. According to published data [ 21 , 22 , 23 ], WTP sludge was introduced into clay in an amount of 5% to 40%. In this study, the minimum value for a preliminary assessment of the effectiveness of the WTP sludge was chosen.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this, the authors recommend the addition of 10% WTP sludge for the production of solid bricks that meet Brazilian national standards. In [ 21 , 23 ], it is also proposed to add no more than 10% WTP sludge due to a decrease in the mechanical characteristics of products. On the other hand, in [ 23 ] it is noted that the addition of 40% WTP sludge and 5% processed tea waste allows to obtain fired clay bricks with improved thermal insulation properties and improved compressive strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…World over, wastewater residue management or valorization, via fixation with building materials, is gaining widespread popularity in circular economy projects (Ahmad et al, 2016;Chang et al, 2020;Gherghel et al, 2019;Guerra-Rodríguez et al, 2020;Kakwani & Kalbar, 2020;Neczaj & Grosser, 2018;Pokhara et al, 2019;Smol et al, 2015).…”
Section: Future Ahead: Groundwater Arsenic Remediation and Wastewater...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…World over, wastewater residue management or valorization, via fixation with building materials, is gaining widespread popularity in circular economy projects (Ahmad et al., 2016; Chang et al., 2020; Gherghel et al., 2019; Guerra‐Rodríguez et al., 2020; Kakwani & Kalbar, 2020; Neczaj & Grosser, 2018; Pokhara et al., 2019; Smol et al., 2015). Therefore, future efforts in arsenic mitigation strategies should attempt to assess whether the ex situ stabilization of arsenic wastes (with clay bricks in a brick‐making factory) generated from ARUs would be financially sustainable over a period of few decades, compared to in situ stabilization of waste in case of ARPs.…”
Section: Future Ahead: Groundwater Arsenic Remediation and Wastewater...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have implemented similar approaches to realize sustainable development. According to Prafulla et al [44], the activated alumina was used to substitute clay to for brick making, and, to a certain extent, the sustainable development model of the brick factory was improved. Taking advantage of fly ash and fly ash wastes, eco-friendly clay brick manufacturing was attempted by Mucahit et al [45].…”
Section: Emergy-based Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%