1936
DOI: 10.1021/ie50320a017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activated Alumina for Removing Fluorides From Drinking Water

Abstract: the rapidly increasing numbers of £9 communities reporting fluorine-bearing wa-W W ters, the occurrence of fluorine toxicosis has taken on added significance and is now generally recognized as a serious public health problem. Many localities find it

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1937
1937
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…BC therefore retains fluoride by chemisorption and ion exchange between dissolved F´ions and PO 4 3´. Electrostatic attraction of dissolved F´is also known to occur in parallel with F´adsorbed via physisorption.…”
Section: Bone Char-based Filters For F´removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…BC therefore retains fluoride by chemisorption and ion exchange between dissolved F´ions and PO 4 3´. Electrostatic attraction of dissolved F´is also known to occur in parallel with F´adsorbed via physisorption.…”
Section: Bone Char-based Filters For F´removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This discovery subsequently obliged two U.S. cities (Bauxite, Arkansas and Oakley, Idaho) to discard abundant water supplies in favor of those containing lower fluoride concentrations [2]. However, for some localities it became apparent that it is extremely technically difficult to find alternative water sources that contain low fluorine levels [2][3][4]. To date, countries including China, Estonia, Ethiopia, Ghana, India, Kenya, Rwanda, South Africa, Tanzania, and Thailand lack regions which have fluoride below acceptable …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defluoridation by activated alumina was successfully demonstrated (Boruff 1934;Fink and Lindsay 1936;Swope and Hess 1937) and the fluoride removal capacity increases directly with fluoride concentration and inversely with pH of the water (Savinelli and Black 1958). De-greased and alkalitreated bone (Smith and Smith 1937) and bone char (Killedar and Bhargava 1988a, b) are also effective in the removal of fluoride from initial concentrations of 3.5-10.0 mg L −1 to less than 0.2 mg L −1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only option for preventing and controlling fluorosis is the defluoridation of drinking water. Various methods have been suggested for reducing the fluoride concentration in drinking water, namely, adsorption 4 precipitation, 5 ion exchange, 6 reverse osmosis, 7 nanofiltration, 8 electrodialysis, 9 and Donnan dialysis. 10 Each of these techniques has advantages and disadvantages that limit its use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%