2016 IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/dsaa.2016.89
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Actitracker: A Smartphone-Based Activity Recognition System for Improving Health and Well-Being

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors of [28] created a system named Actitracker, that performs the recognition of walking, jogging, going up stairs, going down stairs, standing, sitting, and lying down activities, using the Random Forest method and accelerometer data. This systems uses the mean and standard deviation for each axis, the bin distribution and the heuristic measure of wave periodicity, with an accuracy around 90% [28].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors of [28] created a system named Actitracker, that performs the recognition of walking, jogging, going up stairs, going down stairs, standing, sitting, and lying down activities, using the Random Forest method and accelerometer data. This systems uses the mean and standard deviation for each axis, the bin distribution and the heuristic measure of wave periodicity, with an accuracy around 90% [28].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another authors implemented the Sliding-Window-based Hidden Markov Model (SW-HMM), and compared this method with SVM and ANN for the recognition of walking, standing, running, going up stairs, and going down stairs activities, using the mean, variance and quartiles of the accelerometer data [26], reporting an accuracy around 80%.The J48 decision tree, Random Forest, Instance-based learning (IBk), and rule induction (J-Rip) methods were used with accelerometer data for the recognition of standing, sitting, going up stairs, going down stairs, walking, and jogging, implementing the Dual-tree complex wavelet transform (DT-CWT), DT-CWT statistical information and orientation as features, reporting an accuracy of 86% for the recognition of all activities [27].The authors of [28] created a system named Actitracker, that performs the recognition of walking, jogging, going up stairs, going down stairs, standing, sitting, and lying down activities, using the Random Forest method and accelerometer data. This systems uses the mean and standard deviation for each axis, the bin distribution and the heuristic measure of wave periodicity, with an accuracy around 90% [28].In [10], the authors implemented a solution using ANN and SVM methods applied to the accelerometer data, in order to identify several activities, such as standing, sitting, standing up from a chair, sitting down on a chair, walking, lying, and falling activities. The features implemented are sum of all magnitude of the vectors, sum of all magnitude of the vectors excluding the gravity, maximum and minimum value of acceleration in gravity vector direction, mean of absolute deviation of acceleration in gravity vector direction, and gravity vector changing angle, reporting that the results have a sensitivity of 96.67% and specificity of 95% [10].In order to the recognition of going up stairs, going down stairs, walking, jogging, and jumping activities, the authors of [29] used the KNN, Random Forests and SVM methods with accelerometer data to identify accurately the activities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig 2 shows accelerometer data graph for walking, jogging, sitting and climbing downstairs. These six activities are divided into two groups: motionless activities (standing and sitting) and motion activities (stair climbing, walking and jogging) [6]. There is notable distinction between motionless activities and motion activities.…”
Section: Activity Recognition Goalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have implemented activity recognition or activity level estimation approaches by applying accelerometers [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. For example, Kwapisz et al identified activity types through smartphones carried in the users’ pockets [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Kwapisz et al identified activity types through smartphones carried in the users’ pockets [11]. Weiss et al established a smartphone-based activity recognition system to monitor personal health [12]. Such studies are useful and have contributed to well-being management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%