2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0956-7135(02)00017-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Actions to reverse the upward curve of foodborne illness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
33
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the items with most non-conformities for both types of companies were "structure & design" followed by "hygiene & cleaning". These results coincide with several studies that conclude that the weak points in food establishments are: contaminated supplies, dirty food contact surfaces, poor personnel hygiene practices, inappropriate storage temperatures, and insufficient cooking (Käferstein, 2003;Fuster-Valls et al, 2008;Jones et al, 2008).…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…On the other hand, the items with most non-conformities for both types of companies were "structure & design" followed by "hygiene & cleaning". These results coincide with several studies that conclude that the weak points in food establishments are: contaminated supplies, dirty food contact surfaces, poor personnel hygiene practices, inappropriate storage temperatures, and insufficient cooking (Käferstein, 2003;Fuster-Valls et al, 2008;Jones et al, 2008).…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…These AUC are very low, suggesting that none of these indicators have any substantial predictive power. E. coli numbers were the most useful classifiers of Salmonella presence in Canadian surface waters [37]. When Salmonella was detected (per liter) in the water sample the E. coli median value was 365 cfu/100 ml, whereas in case of samples with no Salmonella detection, the E. coli median value was 54 cfu/100 ml.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The association between each assumed risk factor and intoxication was estimated using relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval. As well as the p-value values using Fisher's exact test [7].…”
Section: Analytical Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%