2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Action-related information trumps system information: Influencing consumers’ intention to reduce food waste

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(77 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to note that this is the first study to address, in a TPB framework, the issue of compatibility between intention to reduce food waste and concrete behaviours. Research, also recently, mostly focuses on intention to reduce food waste (e.g., [53]); in the smaller number of TPB-based studies which also address behaviour, this is operationalized asking participants to self-report the food they throw away, or they do not throw away [35,54]. It appears clearly that throwing away food could not be interpreted as a behaviour compatible with the intention to reduce food waste.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that this is the first study to address, in a TPB framework, the issue of compatibility between intention to reduce food waste and concrete behaviours. Research, also recently, mostly focuses on intention to reduce food waste (e.g., [53]); in the smaller number of TPB-based studies which also address behaviour, this is operationalized asking participants to self-report the food they throw away, or they do not throw away [35,54]. It appears clearly that throwing away food could not be interpreted as a behaviour compatible with the intention to reduce food waste.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the research model in the literature however stops at the intention construct (e.g. Goh et al, 2019;Neubig et al, 2020;Rathore & Sarmah, 2021) which gives this current research an opportunity to fill the research gap. In fact, the findings of Russell et al (2017) underscore the importance of not relying on intention as a proxy measure for behaviour.…”
Section: The Intention-behaviour Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, this could be explained by the fact that consumers might not be fully aware of the amount of food waste generated every year, and it seems that they underestimate their own responsibility in relation to this problem; instead, producers and retailers are blamed as those being the ones mainly responsible for this problem (Neubig et al 2020). On the other hand, consumers might not be completely aware of the implications of potential mismanagement of food safety (Gallo et al, 2021), until an event triggers their attention and spoils their trust in the food supply chain, (e.g., mad cow disease or the horse meat scandal) (Cates et al, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature indicates that this is an interesting aspect that needs to be delved into. In fact, as Neubig et al (2020) claimed, consumer knowledge about general food waste and their food waste system is relatively poor. Even more surprisingly, it seems that consumers underestimate their own responsibility in relation to the food waste problem.…”
Section: Sb (Sustainable Behaviour)mentioning
confidence: 99%