2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2021.108029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Action-related auditory ERP attenuation is not modulated by action effect relevance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, several studies investigating attention-based explanations of SA suggest that attention effects may not be sufficient in explaining attenuation of self-generated actions and that both effects might be additive rather than intertwined with each other (Saupe et al, 2013). No significant differences in auditory ERP attenuation were found if attention was allocated towards non-auditory sensory input, motor behavior, or auditory stimuli (Timm et al, 2013;Neszmélyi and Horváth, 2021). However, other studies could show that attention increases sensory processing in SA paradigms, even outweighing the effects of SA in certain cases.…”
Section: Attention Vs Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, several studies investigating attention-based explanations of SA suggest that attention effects may not be sufficient in explaining attenuation of self-generated actions and that both effects might be additive rather than intertwined with each other (Saupe et al, 2013). No significant differences in auditory ERP attenuation were found if attention was allocated towards non-auditory sensory input, motor behavior, or auditory stimuli (Timm et al, 2013;Neszmélyi and Horváth, 2021). However, other studies could show that attention increases sensory processing in SA paradigms, even outweighing the effects of SA in certain cases.…”
Section: Attention Vs Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In two-stage learning paradigms that use choice reaction tasks (e.g., Dutzi & Hommel, 2009), participants are more likely to select an action when the sensory effect associated with the action in a preceding acquisition phase is repeated as a go signal. Recent research, however, suggests that auditory and visual action effects not only influence selection between well-distinguishable actions (e.g., actions performed with the two hands) but are also actively used in shaping the motor parameters when only a single interaction opportunity is available (Horváth et al, 2018; Neszmélyi & Horváth, 2017, 2021). Specifically, quick ballistic actions (pinches, taps, and button presses) are executed with smaller force when the actions consistently result in sounds or light flashes, in comparison with actions without such sensory effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%