2015 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision 2015
DOI: 10.1109/wacv.2015.124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Action Recognition Using Discriminative Structured Trajectory Groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(52 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all our experiments, we first learn a GMM with 512 components and reduce the dimensionality of the final encoding to half using PCA. This is similar to the procedures in [39,3,4].…”
Section: Video Representationsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…In all our experiments, we first learn a GMM with 512 components and reduce the dimensionality of the final encoding to half using PCA. This is similar to the procedures in [39,3,4].…”
Section: Video Representationsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The hierarchy was first computed using a divisive clustering algorithm and then represented a BOF-liked structure where each node was modeled by a bag-of-feature over MBH descriptors. In [28], the video was structured using bag of trajectory groups with latent class variables and employing multiple instance learning (MIL)-based support vector machine (SVM) to classification. More recently, Vig et al [29] revealed that the HAR performance can be maintained with as little as 30-40% of descriptors picked at random within dense trajectory-based approach [23].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, there exists a wealth of papers in this particular domain. The most recent literature on HAR from videos include trajectory-based descriptors [1]- [3], spatiotemporal feature representations [4]- [6], feature encoding [7]- [9], and deep learning [10]- [12]. Reviewing the extensive list of video-based HAR studies, however, goes beyond the scope of this study and we refer the reader to [13], [14] for a collection of more comprehensive surveys on the topic.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The actigraph accelerometer data contains post-filtered "counts" for each of the axes. These counts quantify the frequency and intensity of the user's activity 3 . Using Troiano's cut point scale [64], the age of a user, and their accelerometer triaxial count, each epoch is labeled with an intensity level: Sedentary, Light, Moderate, or Vigorous.…”
Section: Activity Mode Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%