The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2022
DOI: 10.1017/s0022377822000642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Action principles and conservation laws for Chew–Goldberger–Low anisotropic plasmas

Abstract: The ideal Chew–Goldberger–Low (CGL) plasma equations, including the double adiabatic conservation laws for the parallel ( $p_\parallel$ ) and perpendicular pressure ( $p_\perp$ ), are investigated using a Lagrangian variational principle. An Euler–Poincaré variational principle is developed and the non-canonical Poisson bracket is obtained, in which the non-canonical variables consist of the mass flux ${\boldsymbol {M}}$ , the densi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Again, the first two terms of this equation are the same as in the non-expanding case. For a detailed derivation, see Hunana et al [43] or Webb et al [45] (we will follow the same definitions). The first term from the Vlasov's equation…”
Section: Appendix Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, the first two terms of this equation are the same as in the non-expanding case. For a detailed derivation, see Hunana et al [43] or Webb et al [45] (we will follow the same definitions). The first term from the Vlasov's equation…”
Section: Appendix Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CGL model together with fluid models taking into account effects introduced by FLR corrections are discussed in full details in the nice survey [15]. As was noted in [15], in recent years there has been an increased emphasis on pressure/temperature anisotropy effects, in particular, on the CGL model (see, e.g., [7,31] and references therein) because the classical magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) fluid description does not satisfy all the needs of astrophysical applications requiring correct modelling of collisionless plasmas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%