1961
DOI: 10.1299/jsme1958.4.507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Action of the Fluid in the Air-Micrometer : 1st Report, Characteristics of Small-Diameter Nozzle and Orifice No.1, In the Case of Compressibility Being Ignored

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(18) and (20), the values of d and S should be measured in cm [22]. And for the back-pressure gauge under study, the pressure ratio P a /P values are also within the considered range as for Eqs.…”
Section: Empirical Equations For the Nozzle-workpiece Sensormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(18) and (20), the values of d and S should be measured in cm [22]. And for the back-pressure gauge under study, the pressure ratio P a /P values are also within the considered range as for Eqs.…”
Section: Empirical Equations For the Nozzle-workpiece Sensormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, unfortunately there was no attempt to develop any pneumatic gauge model. However, earlier more extensive experimental study on fluid flows within pneumatic gauging for different designs of flow restrictors was carried out and presented in the series of reports by Nakayama [18][19][20][21][22]. The steady-flow models of five types of rounded flow restrictors, twenty four types of cylindrical flow restrictors, and five types of knife-edged fixed metering orifices with internal diameters changing from 0.3 to 1.2 mm were investigated for Reynolds numbers varying from 550 to 10,000 and by using distilled water, low-and high-pressure air.…”
Section: Pneumatic Gauge Empirical Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the noncavitating flows, Nakayama [8] gave the following equation based on the experimental data.…”
Section: Fuel Leaking Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies revealed that cavitation formation is not sensitive to fuel physical properties, but depends more significantly on the nozzle geometry, 29 especially the inlet curvature radius and conicity. 41,45 Furthermore, mathematical correlations for the discharge coefficient were also formulated typically with a function of Reynolds number and cavitation number, etc., [47][48][49][50] which greatly helped guide the nozzle designing process. Nevertheless, most of these correlations were derived from simplified step-wise cylindrical nozzle geometries with sharp corners, and the measurements were primarily conducted under relatively low injection and ambient pressure conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%