2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1937-8327.1998.tb00084.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Action Learning in the UK

Abstract: This article gives a brief overview of what is happening in action learning in the United Kingdom. In thumbnail sketches, some 20 programs are described, showing the diverse applications and possibilities. The article also explores some questions that practitioners and “users” of action learning are asking and debating: How should projects be decided on? How to determine the make‐up of a set? Should the processes in the set be adhered to? Do you need set advisers? Lastly, the article reports on the debate abou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, learning ( ta‘līm ) can be conceived as the process of acquiring knowledge. Therefore, its main features are critical thinking and pragmatic problem-solving skills (Weinstein, 2012). The urge to learn can be active in a person throughout his lifetime.…”
Section: Toward a Comprehensive Learning Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, learning ( ta‘līm ) can be conceived as the process of acquiring knowledge. Therefore, its main features are critical thinking and pragmatic problem-solving skills (Weinstein, 2012). The urge to learn can be active in a person throughout his lifetime.…”
Section: Toward a Comprehensive Learning Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some articles (Hites, 1996;Hara & Schwen, 1999) focus specifically on training and instructional design. Many articles make comparisons of particular practices (e.g., management practices) between or among countries; (Ardichvili, 2001;Ardichvili & Kuchinke, 2002;Cseh et al, 2004;Hanson & Saban, 2001;Kuchinke, 1999;Osman-Gani, 2000;Saban, Hanson, & Lanasa, 2000), while others describe particular practices in one country (Agut & Grau, 2002;Anders & Anderson, 2000;Ardichvili, Cardozo, & Gasparishvili, 1998;Hickey, 2004;Kuchinke, 2000;Nafukho & Hinton, 2003;Paul & Anantharaman, 2004;van Leeuwen & van Praag, 2002;Weinstein, 1998;Wognum, 1998;Xiao & Tsang, 2004;Yui & Saner, 1998). Sanchez (2000) addresses designing performance improvement interventions to suit national culture dimensions, but does not address other contextual issues.…”
Section: Cross-national Similarities and Differences In Employee Percmentioning
confidence: 99%