2016
DOI: 10.1057/s41290-016-0009-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Action in culture: Act I of the presidential primary campaign in the U.S., April to December, 2015

Abstract: This article offers a thick description of the United States during the first nine months of the 2016 presidential election competition. It argues that this competition is organized in a theatrical way, and that this period, from April to December 2015, represents act one of the drama. It argues that performances in act one contribute to setting the cultural and interpretive conditions in which citizens will enter and act back on the drama in its subsequent acts, in state primaries and caucuses, and in the gen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the micro-level, societalization can be conceptualized as a series of performances and counter-performances (Alexander 2011; Alexander, Giesen, and Mast 2006; Mast 2016; Norton 2014b; Reed 2013). Investigative journalists scan the social horizon for big stories, hoping to lob incriminating constructions to citizen-audiences who will fuse with their indignant narrations, sharing their rage.…”
Section: Why Does Societalization Happen?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the micro-level, societalization can be conceptualized as a series of performances and counter-performances (Alexander 2011; Alexander, Giesen, and Mast 2006; Mast 2016; Norton 2014b; Reed 2013). Investigative journalists scan the social horizon for big stories, hoping to lob incriminating constructions to citizen-audiences who will fuse with their indignant narrations, sharing their rage.…”
Section: Why Does Societalization Happen?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, the present moment offers an ideal opportunity to examine confluences and departures between charismatic and gendered power. It has now become a matter of scholarly consensus, for example, to say that Trump is "charismatic" to those who support him (Hochschild 2016;Joosse 2018aJoosse , 2018bLukes 2017;Mast 2016;Meyer 2016;Wagner-Pacifici and Tavory 2017;Zaretsky 2019). Indeed, Steven Lukes (2017, p. 1) assessed Trump's first year as President and noted that his "exercising of presidential power approximated Weber's ideal-typical picture of how charisma works … remarkably closely."…”
Section: Theorizing Gender and Charisma In The Time Of Trumpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He had defused the criticism with humor, defied the logic of Presidential disqualification that was clearly in operation, and escaped from what, for any other candidate, would have been a deadly snare (Joosse 2018a, pp. 931-932;Mast 2016).…”
Section: Theorizing Gender and Charisma In The Time Of Trumpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, in the recent presidential elections, the belittled underdog Donald Trump not only outplayed his Republican rivals (cf. Mast 2016), but eventually defeated the Democrat Hillary Clinton, odds-on favorite for most commentators, utilizing a novel performative repertoire combining public transgressions with populist symbolism. It seems fitting that an American cultural sociologist, Jeffrey C. Alexander, highlighted and elaborated performance as an integral part of modern politics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%