1996
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.53.5373
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Action at a distance as a full-value solution of Maxwell equations: The basis and application of the separated-potentials method

Abstract: The inadequacy of Liénard-Wiechert potentials is demonstrated as one of the examples related to the inconsistency of the conventional classical electrodynamics. The insufficiency of the Faraday-Maxwell concept to describe the whole electromagnetic phenomena and the incompleteness of a set of solutions of Maxwell equations are discussed and mathematically proved. Reasons of the introduction of the so-called "electrodynamics dualism concept" (simultaneous coexistence of instantaneous Newton long-range and Farada… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the classical definition of a partial time derivative (14), a function f does not explicitly possess mathematical characteristics of properly fluid quantity (recently, this fact was also critically pointed out in [6][9] but on different positions). Anyway, contrarily to what is explicitly assumed in (12), in the definition (14) there is no indication that f is submitted to non-zero geometrical transformation H t associated with non-zero flow velocity field v. Therefore, (14) is not directly applicable to treat time derivatives of fluid quantities.…”
Section: Fluid Quantities and Time Derivatives For Lagrangian And Eulmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the classical definition of a partial time derivative (14), a function f does not explicitly possess mathematical characteristics of properly fluid quantity (recently, this fact was also critically pointed out in [6][9] but on different positions). Anyway, contrarily to what is explicitly assumed in (12), in the definition (14) there is no indication that f is submitted to non-zero geometrical transformation H t associated with non-zero flow velocity field v. Therefore, (14) is not directly applicable to treat time derivatives of fluid quantities.…”
Section: Fluid Quantities and Time Derivatives For Lagrangian And Eulmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both definitions (12) and (13) are equivalent so that later on we shall refer only to the conventional expression (12). Important to note that in this classical definition of the total time derivative for Lagrangian observer, a function f is supposed to be submitted to non-zero geometrical transformation H t associated with non-zero flow velocity field v.…”
Section: Fluid Quantities and Time Derivatives For Lagrangian And Eulmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…has recently been discussed [1][2][3][4][5]. The idea of this coexistence is partially motivated by the striking result that the scalar potential in the Coulomb gauge is an instantaneous quantity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%