2009
DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.027706-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Actinomyces naeslundii in initial dental biofilm formation

Abstract: The combined use of confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) offers new opportunities for analysis of the spatial relationships and temporal changes of specific members of the microbiota of intact dental biofilms. The purpose of this study was to analyse the patterns of colonization and population dynamics of Actinomyces naeslundii compared to streptococci and other bacteria during the initial 48 h of biofilm formation in the oral cavity. Biofilms developed on stan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
92
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
4
92
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Clean enamel, glass, or hydroxyapatite surfaces in the mouth are initially colonized by a mixed community in which Streptococcus and Actinomyces are prominent (32)(33)(34). Previous models of development and succession in plaque, after initial colonization, assign a central role to Fusobacterium spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Clean enamel, glass, or hydroxyapatite surfaces in the mouth are initially colonized by a mixed community in which Streptococcus and Actinomyces are prominent (32)(33)(34). Previous models of development and succession in plaque, after initial colonization, assign a central role to Fusobacterium spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems likely that Corynebacterium finds attachment sites on the preexisting biofilm consisting of Streptococcus and Actinomyces, which are among the early colonizers (33) and can be found near the base of hedgehog structures. EM examination of the microbial community colonizing removable enamel chips worn inside the mouth showed scattered filamentous cells oriented perpendicularly to the primarily coccus-covered surface at 24 hours and a mixed community of abundant filamentous organisms by 48 hours (39), suggesting that colonization with Corynebacterium may take place around the 24-hour stage in plaque development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These three strains were selected because S. mutans is a well-established virulent cariogenic bacterium (32). S. gordonii, a pioneer colonizer of dental biofilm, is arginolytic and ADS positive (33), and A. naeslundii is also detected during the early stages of dental biofilm formation (34). Furthermore, S. mutans UA159 and S. gordonii DL1 have been used in multiple laboratories in several in vitro biofilm models, and they are the strain of choice for in vivo (rodent) models of dental caries (35)(36)(37)(38)(39).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While all these studies could only identify the biofilm bacteria based on morphology or cell wall structure (if electron microscopy was used) and differentiate between live and dead organisms using vitality stains, some more recent studies used fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) technologies to identify targeted biofilm bacteria at the species level [e.g. [18][19][20][21]. The application of phylogenetic group-or species-specific single cell identification techniques to undisturbed biofilms formed supragingivally in the oral cavity on retrievable surfaces is currently the state of the art, and promises to reveal important new information on supragingival plaque formation and architecture.…”
Section: Methods To Study Subgingival Biofilm Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These bacteria are embedded in somewhat fibrous membrane- Electron microscopic views. Reproduced with permission of the American Academy of Periodontology [21,22]. c Stained with a FITC-labeled universal bacterial probe that stains the bacteria green.…”
Section: Subgingival Plaque Structurementioning
confidence: 99%