2001
DOI: 10.1081/sei-100103276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Actinide Partitioning—a Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
331
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 510 publications
(333 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
1
331
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3 However, it is first necessary to separate the actinides from the bulk of the lanthanides and other fission and corrosion products that are also present in the acidic PUREX waste streams because the lanthanides have high neutron capture cross-sections. 4 The separation of the radioactive minor actinides from the lanthanides is therefore one of the principal current challenges in nuclear waste reprocessing. This separation is made all the more difficult, given the chemical similarities between the two groups of elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 However, it is first necessary to separate the actinides from the bulk of the lanthanides and other fission and corrosion products that are also present in the acidic PUREX waste streams because the lanthanides have high neutron capture cross-sections. 4 The separation of the radioactive minor actinides from the lanthanides is therefore one of the principal current challenges in nuclear waste reprocessing. This separation is made all the more difficult, given the chemical similarities between the two groups of elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several multi-cycle partition processes have been developed in order to treat high-level radioactive liquid waste (HLLW), [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Generally speaking, after the partition process, alkali borosilicate glasses are the matrix of choice for the immobilization of the HLLW, since they permit vitrification of waste stream of variable composition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25,26] Significant effort has been dedicated towards the development of efficient uranyl cation extraction agents for both analytical and industrial applications, but these studies typically address low pH conditions typical of industrial metal separations technologies. [27,28] However, the rational development of biological decorporation agents necessarily requires studying the efficacy of uranyl chelation at in vivo pH ranges which are higher than those of industrial/remediation applications. Examples of biologically relevant investigations include that of Czerwinski and co-workers that addresses uranyl speciation with the naturally-occuring siderophore desferrioxamine (DFO) [29] as well as those by Durbin and co-workers that examine the in vivo decorporating ability of polybidentate catecholamides and their structural analogs towards the uranyl and transuranic cations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%