1973
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.70.6.1688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Actin in Dividing Cells: Contractile Ring Filaments Bind Heavy Meromyosin

Abstract: Many microfilaments and microtubules are well preserved after glycerol-extraction of HeLa cells at room temperature (220). Incubation in heavy meromyosin from rabbit skeletal muscle results in conspicuous and characteristic "decoration" of microfilaments of the contractile ring. Decoration is completely prevented by 10 mM ATP or 2 mM pyrophosphate, and fails to occur if heavy meromyosin is either omitted or replaced by egg albumin, a nonspecific protein. Decorated microfilaments have a substructure consisting … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

10
146
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 288 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
10
146
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The eyecup was initially placed in a standard salt solution (0.1 M KCI and 5 mM MgCI~ in 6 mM Na-phosphate buffer at pH 7.0 [SSS]) for 7 min, next it was treated in a series of glycerol solutions for 7 min each (5,10,20,30, and 40% glycerol in SSS) and then in another series of glycerol solutions for 2 h each (50, 20, and 5% glycerol in SSS). Finally, the eyecup was immersed for 17-20 h at 0°C in a HMM ~ solution (approximately 2.5-5 mg/ml in 15--25% glycerol in SSS) or it was treated with one of the following control solutions in which no binding of H M M to actin should occur (22,26): (a) SSS alone; (b) HMM (2.5 mg/ml) in SSS containing I0 mM ATP; (c) HMM (2.5 mg/ml) in SSS containing 10 mM inorganic phosphate. Tissue from control solutions (b) and (c) was postrinsed in the same solutions without HMM (26) for the 30 min immediately preceding fixation to remove unbound HMM.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eyecup was initially placed in a standard salt solution (0.1 M KCI and 5 mM MgCI~ in 6 mM Na-phosphate buffer at pH 7.0 [SSS]) for 7 min, next it was treated in a series of glycerol solutions for 7 min each (5,10,20,30, and 40% glycerol in SSS) and then in another series of glycerol solutions for 2 h each (50, 20, and 5% glycerol in SSS). Finally, the eyecup was immersed for 17-20 h at 0°C in a HMM ~ solution (approximately 2.5-5 mg/ml in 15--25% glycerol in SSS) or it was treated with one of the following control solutions in which no binding of H M M to actin should occur (22,26): (a) SSS alone; (b) HMM (2.5 mg/ml) in SSS containing I0 mM ATP; (c) HMM (2.5 mg/ml) in SSS containing 10 mM inorganic phosphate. Tissue from control solutions (b) and (c) was postrinsed in the same solutions without HMM (26) for the 30 min immediately preceding fixation to remove unbound HMM.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous reports of bright fluorescent-HMM staining of the cleavage furrow of similar cultured cells (20) may be the result of selective actin extraction from the adjacent cytoplasm during glycerination. There is no question that a circumferential band of actin filaments, the contractile ring, is concentrated in the cleavage furrow (22,20). It seems possible that cortical actin, adjacent to the contractile ring, has gone unnoticed by electron microscopy because it is poorly preserved or less well organized than the contractile ring actin filaments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These preparative methods gave no information concerning the localization of the actin within the egg, but there is good evidence lor its presence in the cleavage furrow during cytokinesis, where it was seen first in the electron microscope as bundles of microfilaments (28,30,37). Actin has been localized in the cleavage furrow in a variety of other cell types ( 1,21,27,29,34) and this actin has been specifically labeled with heavy meromyosin (31).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%