2008
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0802286105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Actin-binding cleft closure in myosin II probed by site-directed spin labeling and pulsed EPR

Abstract: We present a structurally dynamic model for nucleotide-and actin-induced closure of the actin-binding cleft of myosin, based on site-directed spin labeling and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) in Dictyostelium myosin II. The actin-binding cleft is a solventfilled cavity that extends to the nucleotide-binding pocket and has been predicted to close upon strong actin binding. Single-cysteine labeling sites were engineered to probe mobility and accessibility within the cleft. Addition of ADP and vanadate, whi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
65
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(39 reference statements)
7
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in the M Ã crystal structure, switch loop I and switch loop II of the active site do not appear to be in the proper position for catalysis of ATP hydrolysis (14,16), suggesting that step 3′ in Scheme 3 is not likely to occur. Indeed the present study, coupled with previous studies, indicates precisely that structural changes in the force-generating region (11,21) and the actin-binding cleft (22) are not tightly coupled to ligand binding at the active site. Rather, each crystal structure represents a trapped structural state among the much larger repertoire available to each biochemical state in solution (4).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, in the M Ã crystal structure, switch loop I and switch loop II of the active site do not appear to be in the proper position for catalysis of ATP hydrolysis (14,16), suggesting that step 3′ in Scheme 3 is not likely to occur. Indeed the present study, coupled with previous studies, indicates precisely that structural changes in the force-generating region (11,21) and the actin-binding cleft (22) are not tightly coupled to ligand binding at the active site. Rather, each crystal structure represents a trapped structural state among the much larger repertoire available to each biochemical state in solution (4).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The dependence of myosin ATPase activity on actin concentration was fitted to determine V max (activity at saturating actin) as reported in Table 2. As reported previously (11), both basal and actin-activated ATPase activities were comparable (within a factor of 2) between unlabeled and labeled proteins and were also comparable (within a factor of 2) to values reported for other Dictyostelium myosin constructs (20,22,33), indicating that neither mutations nor labeling caused significant effects on myosin catalytic activity (Table 2). ðTRÞ 2 FRET Experiments.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus the internal atomic motions within the active site that govern P i rebinding may be much more dynamic than the static high-resolution structures might imply. This notion is supported by recent observations that opening and closing of myosin's actin-binding cleft is highly dynamic in solution (17). Future work should attempt to capture the dynamic nature of P i release and rebinding within myosin's active site to provide a more detailed picture of how P i is coupled to the generation of force and motion during contraction.…”
Section: Perspectives and Significancementioning
confidence: 58%
“…Doubleelectron-electron resonance (DEER) spectroscopy allows the measurement of distances between two spin-labeled residues in the range of 2-6 nm, in favorable cases even 8 nm (9, 10). This technique is especially useful for the prediction of protein structure (11, 12) as well as for measuring structure dynamics (13,14). Electron spin echo envelope modulation (ESEEM) spectroscopy, also a pulse EPR technique, yields additional structural information by determining the water accessibility of singly spin-labeled protein domains (15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%