CriSTaL 2016
DOI: 10.14426/cristal.v4i1.50
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Actant affordances: a brief history of affordance theory and a Latourian extension for education technology research

Abstract: Affordance theory provides a useful lens to explore the action opportunities that arise between users and technology, especially in education. However developments in the theory have resulted both in confusion and misapplication, due partly to issues related to affordance theory's ontology. This paper outlines two competing perspectives on affordances by Gibson and Norman, before arguing that Latour's theory of 'actants' provides a useful middle way between these competing positions. This 'actant affordance' p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the first dimension, we include the contributions that focus on the methodological approaches of political theory to digitalisation in the field of politics. We 6 Beyond political science, the concept of affordance, which is attributed to Gibson (2014), is now very widely used (for an overview, see for instance Evans et al 2017or Hopkins 2016for communication studies Katzenbach 2018, p. 225 ff;Nagy and Neff 2015;in social theory, Ettlinger 2018; for design studies Norman 1999 and the science and technology studies Blewett andHugo 2016 or Leonardi 2011; in social science, already early on Hutchby 2001; cf. also the phenomenological conception of technical scopes in Waldenfels 1991).…”
Section: The Contributions To the Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first dimension, we include the contributions that focus on the methodological approaches of political theory to digitalisation in the field of politics. We 6 Beyond political science, the concept of affordance, which is attributed to Gibson (2014), is now very widely used (for an overview, see for instance Evans et al 2017or Hopkins 2016for communication studies Katzenbach 2018, p. 225 ff;Nagy and Neff 2015;in social theory, Ettlinger 2018; for design studies Norman 1999 and the science and technology studies Blewett andHugo 2016 or Leonardi 2011; in social science, already early on Hutchby 2001; cf. also the phenomenological conception of technical scopes in Waldenfels 1991).…”
Section: The Contributions To the Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…xAPI will therefore only be able to represent the defined activities, whereas all other forms of interaction with a platform -including other learning activities, which will inevitably take place (cf. Blewett & Hugo, 2016) -will be non-existing in the produced data and will not be reconstructable during data analysis. As a consequence, all those interactions that are not foreseen or predefined are rendered invisible.…”
Section: Translations Required In the Implementation Of Xapimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent years have seen attention given to the ways in which nonhuman artifacts “script” (Akrich, 1992) actors, “prescribe” conduct, and exert influence over the environment in which they are located. Although affordance theory is strongly contested (Blewett & Hugo, 2016; Davis & Chouinard, 2016; Knappett, 2004), it nevertheless provides a useful concept to bring to an analysis of social media practices as it offers a way to think through the material capacities of the platforms. Originally conceptualized by James Gibson (1986) drawing on Lewin’s aufforderung-scharakter (invitation character) as a way of understanding how material objects project certain potentialities or suggest a set of actions by those coming into contact with them, the phenomenological idea that objects afford specific behaviors has since been adopted and developed by numerous disciplines, from psychology to design, anthropology to philosophy.…”
Section: Affording Trust: Social Media Habitsmentioning
confidence: 99%