2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2008.02.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Across-wind responses of an aeroelastic tapered tall building

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As buildings are getting taller and more flexible, wind load becomes one of the main controlling loads in the design of these buildings particularly in the strong typhoon area. Aerodynamic measure is usually used to reduce wind‐induced loads and responses of the buildings, especially for the super tall buildings beyond the height of 500 m . Previous wind disaster surveys reported in the literature indicate that although the structural collapse of tall buildings due to wind loading is rarely reported, the building envelopes, especially the glass curtain, are often damaged under wind loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As buildings are getting taller and more flexible, wind load becomes one of the main controlling loads in the design of these buildings particularly in the strong typhoon area. Aerodynamic measure is usually used to reduce wind‐induced loads and responses of the buildings, especially for the super tall buildings beyond the height of 500 m . Previous wind disaster surveys reported in the literature indicate that although the structural collapse of tall buildings due to wind loading is rarely reported, the building envelopes, especially the glass curtain, are often damaged under wind loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that rather complicated sectional shapes can reduce wind loads, which are an important issue in tall-building wind-resistant design, has also contributed to the current trend. The effectiveness of aerodynamic modification to reduce wind loads has been widely reported, and aerodynamic modifications thought to be effective include those to sectional shape (horizontally) such as polygon or Y-type (Hayashida and Iwasa, 1990;Hayashida et al, 1992) and corners (Shiraishi et al, 1986;Kwok et al, 1988;Miyashita et al, 1993;Amano, 1995;Kawai, 1998), building shape (vertically) such as taper (Cooper et al, 1997;Kim and You, 2002;Kim et al, 2008;Kim and Kanda, 2010a;2010b) and setback (Kim and Kanda, 2010a,b), as well as introduction of openings (Dutton andIsyumou, 1990, Miyashita et al, 1993). However, most of the above papers have focused on the effect of one aerodynamic modification that changes systematically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kim and Kanda (), Kim et al . () and You et al . () analyzed the effectiveness of taper elevation and step retraction elevation through a wind tunnel test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%