2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ACR CT Accreditation Program and the Lung Cancer Screening Program Designation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the USA, guidance on the investigation and management of pulmonary nodules, including further surgical and non-surgical management, is already available from the ACCP 8. Lung cancer screening is currently recommended in the USA,20 and programmes are required to adhere to a more protocol-driven (but also diameter-based), quality-assured standard of reporting such as the American College of Radiology Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) 21. In contrast, lung cancer screening is not yet recommended or widely available in the UK.…”
Section: Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the USA, guidance on the investigation and management of pulmonary nodules, including further surgical and non-surgical management, is already available from the ACCP 8. Lung cancer screening is currently recommended in the USA,20 and programmes are required to adhere to a more protocol-driven (but also diameter-based), quality-assured standard of reporting such as the American College of Radiology Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) 21. In contrast, lung cancer screening is not yet recommended or widely available in the UK.…”
Section: Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The American College of Radiology has published guidelines for LDCT image acquisition, reporting, and quality control, along with criteria for designation as a lung cancer screening center with an emphasis on the imaging components. 45 …”
Section: Computed Tomography Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was recognized that a model for quality monitoring comes from the American College of Radiology where there is a program to monitor CT scan dose. (14) The system involves having de-identified data sent to a central repository where it is analyzed and reports are sent back to individual sites that provide summary dose reports as well as comparisons to other facilities. It was also recognized that the opportunity will exist to go beyond reporting parameters that can be extracted from the DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) files which are the standard format for digital image storage for medical images.…”
Section: Status Of Harms Reduction: Dose Minimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%