Acquisition versus retrieval deficits in traumatic brain injury: Implications for memory rehabilitation

DeLuca, John; Schultheis, Maria T.; Madigan, Nancy; Christodoulou, Christopher; Averill, Allison

doi:10.1053/apmr.2000.9390

Cited by 94 publications

(69 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Other studies including patients with mild traumatic brain injuries 5,9,12,13) showed mixed results, but most studies including those on patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injuries 4,7,8,11,19,21,35,41,[45][46][47][48][49] showed impaired memory functions. These results show that the relationship between the severity of the injury and memory performance of patients with TBI is moderate 25,26) .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Memory Dysfunctions after Mild and Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury : Comparison between Patients with and without Frontal Lobe Injury

Kim

Seo

et al. 2009

J Korean Neurosurg Soc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective : The purpose of this study was to assess memory dysfunction in patients with mild and moderate traumatic brain injury (TBI) with and without frontal lobe injury (FLI). Methods : The subjects were 110 TBI patients, who had recovered from the acute clinical phase, and comprised 20 (18.2%) mild TBI (MTBI) patients with FLI, 16 (14.5%) MTBI patients without FLI, 51 (46.4%) moderate TBI (MOTBI) patients with FLI and 23 (20.9%) MTBI patients without FLI. All patients were administrated the Korean version of the Memory Assessment Scale (K-MAS). Results : Almost all the Summary Scale scores on the K-MAS failed to show any differences between TBI patients with and without FLI, but differences did emerge by types at severities. TBI patients with FLI showed higher Global Memory ability than TBI patients without FLI if their TBI was only mild, but when their TBI was more severe, this finding was reversed, and TBI patients with FLI showed lower Verbal and Global Memory abilities than TBI patients without FLI. Conclusion : Different kinds of assessment tools are needed for the measurement of memory abilities in TBI patients with FLI, and that the selection of the appropriate tool depends on the severity of the TBI.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Memory Dysfunctions after Mild and Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury : Comparison between Patients with and without Frontal Lobe Injury

Kim

Seo

et al. 2009

J Korean Neurosurg Soc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Despite these developments there is also evidence that these hypothesised constructs may overlap (Clune-Ryberg et al, 2011). However consideration of cognitive functioning from a domain perspective continues to provide useful insights into improving rehabilitation practices and understanding the impact of cognitive impairment on real-world functioning and quality of life (DeLuca, Schultheis, Madigan, Christodoulou, & Averill, 2000;Silverberg & Millis, 2009). …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cognitive functioning following traumatic brain injury: A five-year follow-up

Marsh

Ludbrook

Gaffaney

2016

NRE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. OBJECTIVE:To describe the long-term prevalence and severity of cognitive deficits following significant (i.e., ventilation required for >24 hours) traumatic brain injury. To assess a comprehensive range of cognitive functions using psychometric measures with established normative, reliability, and validity data. METHODS: A group of 71 adults was assessed at approximately five years (mean = 66 months) following injury. Assessment of cognitive functioning covered the domains of intelligence, attention, verbal and visual memory, visual-spatial construction, and executive functions. RESULTS: Impairment was evident across all domains but prevalence varied both within and between domains. Across aspects of intelligence clinical impairment ranged from 8-25%, attention 39-62%, verbal memory 16-46%, visual memory 23-51%, visual-spatial construction 38%, and executive functions (verbal fluency) 13%. In addition, 3-23% of performances across the measures were in the borderline range, suggesting a high prevalence of subclinical deficit. CONCLUSIONS: Although the prevalence of impairment may vary across cognitive domains, long-term follow-up documented deficits in all six domains. These findings provide further evidence that while improvement of cognitive functioning following significant traumatic brain injury may be possible, recovery of function is unlikely.

show abstract

“…The primary reason for difficulties in new learning and memory in people with TBI is difficulty in the initial acquisition of information rather than the retrieval of information from long-term storage (DeLuca, Schultheis, Madigan, Christodoulou, & Averill, 2000). That is, people with TBI have difficulty learning new information but not in retrieving it from long-term memory.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…That is, people with TBI have difficulty learning new information but not in retrieving it from long-term memory. Specifically, DeLuca et al (2000) determined that when participants with TBI and healthy control participants (HC) reached a predetermined learning criterion, people with TBI recalled and recognized the learned information at a level comparable to that of healthy adults. However, participants with TBI required significantly more trials to reach this learning criterion.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Pilot Study to Examine the Use of Self-Generation to Improve Learning and Memory in People With Traumatic Brain Injury

Goverover

Chiaravalloti

DeLuca

2010

The American Journal of Occupational Therapy

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

People with traumatic brain injury (TBI) experience memory and learning difficulties. Difficulty in the initial acquisition of information is a primary reason people with TBI experience difficulties in learning and memory. Treatment focusing on improving the acquisition of information will likely improve both recall and recognition performance. In the "generation effect," items self-generated are remembered better than items read or otherwise provided. The purpose of this study was to examine the application of the generation effect in improving memory for functional activities. The study used a within-subjects design and included 10 participants with TBI and 15 healthy control participants. Results demonstrated that material learned under the generated learning conditions was recalled better than when generated under provided learning conditions. This finding was true in both the TBI and the control groups. These results provide initial evidence supporting the use of self-generation to improve new learning of functional tasks for people with TBI. Goverover, Y., Chiaravalloti, N., & DeLuca, J. (2010). Pilot study to examine the use of self-generation to improve learning and memory in people with traumatic brain injury.

show abstract

Acquisition versus retrieval deficits in traumatic brain injury: Implications for memory rehabilitation

Cited by 94 publications

References 28 publications

Memory Dysfunctions after Mild and Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury : Comparison between Patients with and without Frontal Lobe Injury

Memory Dysfunctions after Mild and Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury : Comparison between Patients with and without Frontal Lobe Injury

Cognitive functioning following traumatic brain injury: A five-year follow-up

Pilot Study to Examine the Use of Self-Generation to Improve Learning and Memory in People With Traumatic Brain Injury

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About