2021
DOI: 10.5128/erya17.05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acquisition of diminutives in typologically different languages: Evidence from Russian and Estonian

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some facets in the acquisition of word-formation-affixation and compounding-are shown in Protassova and Voeikova (2007), Kazakovskaya (2017) and Kazakovskaya and Voeikova (2021). An attempt to compare both affixation and compounding with the data of the compound-rich Estonian language was made in Kazakovskaya (2013, 2018) and Kazakovskaya and Argus (2021). Systematic study of derivational morphology in the comparative-Russian-German-standpoint is being undertaken for the first time.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some facets in the acquisition of word-formation-affixation and compounding-are shown in Protassova and Voeikova (2007), Kazakovskaya (2017) and Kazakovskaya and Voeikova (2021). An attempt to compare both affixation and compounding with the data of the compound-rich Estonian language was made in Kazakovskaya (2013, 2018) and Kazakovskaya and Argus (2021). Systematic study of derivational morphology in the comparative-Russian-German-standpoint is being undertaken for the first time.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also important to note that the proportion of diminutives may not always depend on child gender. In particular, in the earlier studies conducted on different monolingual data it was claimed that there were more diminutives in girls' speech than in boys' (Gleason et al 1990;Protassova, Voeikova 2007;Kazakovskaya, Argus 2021). However, in the speech of bilingual Anna, the percentage of diminutive lemmas in relation to all nouns is lower than in Fillip's (p<0.001).…”
Section: Suffix Inventorymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Keeled liigituvad rohkem või vähem deminutiivi lembesteks. Meie oma läänemeresoome keelterühmaski on osa keeli deminutiivirikkamad (vepsa, lüüdi, karjala, lõunaeesti), deminutiivivaesemaks on hinnatud näiteks eesti keel (nt Kazakovskaya, Argus 2021;Kupp-Sazonov 2019). Seto deminutiivirohkuse näitlikustamiseks sobib hästi üks juhuslik katke muinasjutust Ello Kirsi kirjapanekutes (Salve 2008), kus 75 sõnast 15 ehk 20% on deminutiivid:…”
Section: Sissejuhatuseksunclassified